How to find out your socionic type. How to determine your socionic type
The psychotype test determines each person, which consists of a genetically given temperament and a character acquired during the first years of life. Character traits can often have accentuation features, i.e. close to possible personality disorders or neurosis. They are classified in exactly the same way using a unique socionics system.
Many people hide a person’s psychotype with a social mask, or, on the contrary, it sticks out more due to a basic personality disorder. All this was taken into account in the preparation of this online test a - therefore, all questions are arranged in a strict, coded sequence to give the most accurate result.
To determine your psychotype, including accentuation of character and temperament, go online now psychotype test free and without registration. Socionics systems are one of the most accurate in the world and this technique is available to you on this page! Hundreds of people have already taken the test to determine their psychological type and it helped them get to know yourself better, your main talent , and also build better relationships with others . Moreover, the psychotype test I offer will help you choose a love partner!
Take a test to determine a person’s personality type:
Given psychotype test includes questions that need to be answered quickly, the first thing that comes to mind. Choose the answer that suits you best.
Having learned more closely the features of his character, everyone can initially be surprised and amazed at the accuracy of revealing the nuances of his character. inner world. Given a psychotype test gives an answer to the most important question in life - with whom to build a relationship and family, how to find your soulmate . Together with your loved one, who will be close to you, life will sparkle with new bright colors and you will feel all the harmony of love and intimacy.
The psychotype test offers you not only to find out about yourself, but also the opportunity to find a suitable psychotype, and among them - those closest to you. Indeed, in addition to the mental complement, community of interests, and the level of culture and education also play a big role. Take this test completely and your life will change!
November 22, 2014
Personality type is made up of a combination 4 signs . In order to find out your type, you must first determine:
if you rational, then in the first place in the name of the type you will have either ethics or logic (i.e. one of the attitudes of consciousness)
If you irrational, then in the first place in the name of the type you will have either intuition or sensory (i.e. one of the functions of perception)
In socionics, it is customary to put extraversion or introversion in last place in the name of a type.
For example, you have identified: extraversion, ethics, sensory and rationality. Consequently, you are an ethical-sensory extrovert (pseudonym - Hugo). Your strong functions are the ethics of emotions and the sensory of sensations. Further you can make recommendations for it.
Of course, it is not always possible to determine the type yourself. To do this, you need to know yourself well and have socionic knowledge. In my blog I will try to give as much information as possible that will help you better understand the basics of socionics and deepen your knowledge.
1. Try to approach yourself objectively. If you find it difficult to choose between two functions (for example, ethics or logic), ask yourself which one is most important to you. comfortable. Which function tasks do you solve with the least amount of energy?
2. Ask yourself what you are better at successful in fact. What do your friends and acquaintances often admire about you?
3. Think about what information you could use train a person so that he can apply it in life, become more successful?
4. Remember what you liked in childhood, what you were more inclined to do, what you were good at and what really interested you.
5. Think about in which area you have been able to apply more than once non-standard, a bold approach, and the result pleased you and those around you.
6. By which of the functions are you able to track information not only about yourself, but also about those around(for example, you are well aware of not only your emotions, but the emotions of other people)
7. In which area is your thinking more similar to "black and white", i.e. you clearly divide: good-bad, right-wrong. Most likely this function is weak.
It should be understood that all four pairs of signs that you will look at are present in every person. It’s just that some sign in the pair is more pronounced. This is what we need to focus on.
Find out whether you are a rational person or an irrational person. A rational person is careful, reasonable, and reads everything in life. He is not distracted and a waste of time, effort, and money. He is first. Irrational is its complete opposite. Absent-minded, forgetful, going with the flow. This guy does it first.
If you classify yourself as irrational, determine whether you are a sensory person or an intuitive person. Sensorik is a down-to-earth person. Down-to-earth - earthly, in contrast to the intuitive who has his head in the clouds. The sensory person is focused on objectivity, his bodily sensations - smells, tastes, etc. Intuitive - focused on subjective perception, senses time, often lives in the past, trying to understand himself.
Now find out whether you are a logician or an ethicist. Logicians know everything, are well versed in facts and events, analyze, calmly operate with facts and figures, “live with their heads.” An ethicist has a great sense of people, the relationships between them, and perceives the world through the prism of his attitude to something. He justifies his actions - “I want!”
The next step is to see if you are an introvert or an extrovert. An extrovert perceives himself as part of objective reality. He receives incentives better from outside and gives emotions only in external environment. Easily takes responsibility for others. An introvert completely trusts his thoughts, desires and feelings. It is difficult for him to establish relationships and he values them very much. He does not like it when the attention of others is focused on him.
Now we determine your socionic type. You are irrational. If you are an intuitive, logician and extrovert, then your socionic type is Don Quixote. Sensory, ethical and introverted – Dumas; sensory, logician and extrovert – Zhukov; intuitive, ethical and introvert - Yesenin; sensory, ethical and extrovert - Napoleon; intuitive, logician and introvert - Balzac; intuitive, ethicist and extrovert - Huxley; sensory, logical and introverted – Gaben.
If you initially defined yourself as rational, then first look at whether you are a logician or an ethicist, then - an intuitive or sensory person, and finally - an extrovert or an introvert.
Now look at the socionic types of rationals and look for yourself. Ethicist, sensory and extrovert - Hugo; logician, intuitive and introvert - Robespierre; ethicist, intuitive and extrovert - Hamlet; logician, sensory and introvert - Maxim Gorky; logician, intuitive and extrovert - Jack London; ethicist, sensory and introvert - Dreiser; logician, sensory and extrovert - Stirlitz; ethicist, intuitive and introvert - Dostoevsky.
It is known that many people who (due to certain beliefs) do not turn to the services of practicing typists are interested in the algorithm that must be followed in order to independently determine your socionic type. Among those interested in socionics, such an algorithm is usually referred to as a “typing method” and it is no secret that at the moment there are a lot of these methods, and, notably, different “professional” typists, using their methods, can create different types, even conflicters and duals (not to mention the ineffectiveness of socionic tests).
In this article, I will not focus on how to understand which socionicist’s arguments are correct and whose conclusions should be followed, but I will try to outline an algorithm that must be followed by those who want to independently determine their socionic type. Naturally, in order to apply it, you must have understanding. If you are not yet familiar with us, I assure you: taking the first steps in studying it with the help of our website will not be at all difficult and all the information necessary for this is freely available.
To begin with, I recommend that you familiarize yourself with how the socionic type is determined in our center. To do this, I suggest you look at the followingvideo on our youtube channel.
In order to learn, just as in the video, to distinguish where in the answers of the person you are typing certain qualities of his socionic type are present, it is necessary that you easily understand the following theoretical points:
- What is information, what are there, information.
- What is and how the socionic type perceives, processes and assimilates information.
- What is a socionic type and with the help of which each type of information metabolism is described.
After this, you can proceed to direct typing. Let's look at our recommended algorithm and explanations for it:
In order for the typing process to be as effective as possible, it is necessary to type directly during communication with the person whose socionic type you want to find out (not to mention self-typing). So you can ask everything important issues, which affect the characteristics of perception, processing and assimilation of information by this person. Typing by quotes, statements, speeches provides too little information and does not allow you to fully test the hypotheses you put forward.
To take the first step in typing, it is necessary to determine which feature of information is voiced by the person being typed: sensory, intuition, logic or ethics. Next, you need to highlight the properties of this feature (static/dynamic or introversion/extroversion) and from this deduce what aspect of information it is. For example, information was voiced about the properties of objects (sensory), or more precisely about how objects with some properties influence objects with others (extroversion), which brings us to the aspect of black sensory.
Next, based on what the person being typed says, it is necessary to determine through which IM property he perceives, processes or assimilates information on this aspect. For example, we see that the person being typed talks a lot about the aspect of black sensory, touches on issues that were not relevant at the time of the conversation, and shows that he spends a lot of his time processing information on this aspect. This speaks of her inertia.
After determining the inert black sensory, we put a plus in favor of Reinin’s “strategy” trait (inertness of sensory and contact of intuition). In the future, to verify this sign, it is necessary to find additional evidence that white and black sensory are inert, and white and black intuition are contact. If there is enough evidence, it will be possible to say with confidence that the person being typed is a “strategist.” From the following table you can see to which types the circle of your suspicions has thus been reduced:
On the other hand, the inertia of the black sensory gives a plus in favor of types with basic, pain, activation or restrictive black sensory (all inert functions). Having determined in the responses of the person being typed other properties through which he perceives, processes or assimilates information on this aspect, it will be possible to draw a conclusion about what function it is. For example, if you determine the inertia, pattern and busyness of the black sensory system, this will suggest that the person being typed has a basic black sensory system. You can also see what properties each function has from the following table:
The final step in typing is to summarize all the arguments in favor of various signs and functions. Ideally, it should be so that there are no contradictory arguments, for example, that a person has all the characteristics of a Balzac, but for some reason he has an inert sensory system (although there should be contact sensory). In this case, you should reconsider your ideas about sensory inertia and try to understand why you defined it. For example, it may be that you confused sensory with psychosophical physics, and inertia with its principled nature (which is typical for 1F or 3F people).
Let's look at how to build your conclusions in practice. Suppose you noticed that during your typing of a certain person, most of all you talked about the topic of relationships, interaction with people, as well as feelings and what abilities your respondent and the people around him have. Judging by which information aspects are responsible for these aspects of life, from the information received you can evaluate the provisions of ethics and sensory in the model of this person’s type. So, when it came to sensory aspects of life, You noticed the properties of “inertia” and “acceptance”, and in particular, when it came to emergencies, the properties of “value” and “mentality” appeared. In turn, in the answers on black ethics, you saw the manifestation of the properties of “template”, “weakness” and “value”. From the table of correspondence of the properties of functions to their position in model A, you can conclude that the person you are typing is a carrier of the basic emergency situation and activation emergency response, that is, his type is “Zhukov” (SLE). Naturally, in order not to make a mistake, it is advisable to determine as many properties as possible, going through all the information aspects, which will take more time.
I hope that now you have a better understanding of how, according to the methodology of “Imperative Socionics”socionic type is determined. If you would like to undergo training with us or find out your type, you will find more detailed information.
They are divided into 4 dichotomies, which are now used to characterize people:
- logic/ethics
- sensory / intuition
- rationality / irrationality
- extroversion / introversion
Also for this definition There are other names: “Socionic type”, “type of information metabolism (IMT)” or “sociotype”, the essence is the same - a description of the perception and processing of information received by a person and how he interacts with the environment.
Characteristics of 16 sociotypes
- Dostoevsky - those who belong to this type They are very well-mannered and tactful, polite and know how to sympathize (empathy), they feel people on an intuitive level and see the intricacies of relationships in detail.
- Yesenin’s basic function is intuition of time; this type perfectly senses the “right moment”, and is also able to see in detail the development of any situation thanks to his predictive abilities.
- Don Quixote is an irrational type who does not burden himself with stereotyped thinking. He sees several options for solving a particular problem at once and realizes the potential hidden in each object.
- Jack London - business logic. Those who belong to this type perceive everything around them as a certain resource - informational, human, time.
- Stirlitz is an extroverted type, capable of acting both independently and by organizing the work of other people. The presence of creative sensory skills allows him to make his work not only effective, but also comfortable.
- Hamlet - this type lives mostly by emotions and, like no one else, feels the energy and emotional atmosphere, which he manipulates very skillfully. He knows a lot about art and the intricacies of aesthetic life.
- Robespierre - those who belong to this type are unlikely to pursue selfish interest or fame. Such people love quality and punctuality, integrity and fairness, they are very responsible.
- Balzac - has an excellent ability to see various shortcomings in a certain situation, which makes him constructive critic. Often such a person is perceived as pessimistic, and his value judgments are defined as cynicism.
- Gaben - for this type, comfort is most valuable; they highly value harmony and tranquility in everything. Such people would prefer to peacefully enjoy existence than to conquer new heights.
- Huxley - he sees great hidden possibilities, be it an object or a situation. People of this type are by nature more ethical than logical; it is for this reason that they are not alien to fantastic ideas that at first glance seem impossible. They are extremely curious and have a phenomenal memory.
- Maxim Gorky is a type of logician for whom cause-and-effect relationships are obvious. Such people live according to a clear schedule, their thinking is rational.
- Dreiser - ethics of relationships. They have very clear moral principles within them, and if they see an external discrepancy with them, they criticize it very harshly.