Shamova management of educational systems. “Development of T.I.
CRITERIA FOR ASSESSING THE PERFORMANCE OF TASK C2 “SPEAKING. MONOLOGICAL SPEECH»
(Maximum b points)
Pronunciation side of speech |
Points |
||
The task was completed in full: the goal of communication was achieved; the topic is fully disclosed (all aspects specified in the assignment are fully disclosed, detailed answers are given to 2 additional questions); sociocultural knowledge is used in accordance with the situation of communication. |
|||
Task accomplished: communication goal achieved; But the topic is not fully disclosed (the aspects indicated in the assignment are not fully disclosed; brief answers are given to 2 additional questions); sociocultural knowledge is mainly used in accordance with the situation of communication. |
The used lexical and grammatical material corresponds to the set communicative task. A variety of vocabulary and mastery of simple and complex grammatical structures, various types of sentences are used. Lexical and grammatical errors are practically absent (no more than 4 minor language errors are allowed that do not impede understanding) |
||
The task was partially completed: the purpose of communication is not fully achieved; the topic is disclosed to a limited extent (not all aspects specified in the task are disclosed; one additional question is answered OR 2 additional questions are answered inaccurately); sociocultural knowledge is little used in accordance with the situation of communication. |
The used lexical and grammatical material as a whole corresponds to the set communicative task. There is some difficulty in the selection of words and inaccuracies in their use. Simple grammatical structures are used. Lexical and grammatical errors are allowed (no more than 6 language errors) |
Speech is understandable: almost all sounds in the speech stream are pronounced correctly: phonemic errors (changing the meaning of the statement) are not allowed; correct intonation pattern |
|
Task not completed: communication goal not achieved |
**Note: Experts evaluate the performance of task C2 according to the following criteria K5-K7:
- K5: Solution communicative task(content) 0-3 points;
- KB: Lexical and grammatical design of speech 0-2 points;
- K7: Pronunciation 0-1 points.
If the examinee receives 0 points according to the criterion "Solution of the communicative problem (content)", the entire task is evaluated at 0 points.
If the examinee reads the text written during the preparation for the oral answer, his answer is estimated at 0 points.
CRITERIA FOR ASSESSING THE PERFORMANCE OF TASK C3 “SPEAKING. DIALOGICAL SPEECH»
(Maximum 9 points)
Solving a communicative problem |
Interaction with the interlocutor |
Lexico-grammatical design of speech |
Pronunciation side of speech |
Points |
The task was completed in full: the goal of communication was achieved; the topic is fully disclosed (all aspects specified in the assignment are fully disclosed); sociocultural knowledge is used in accordance with the situation of communication. |
Demonstrates good skills and abilities of verbal interaction with a partner: knows how to start, maintain and end a conversation; observes the order in the exchange of remarks, restores the conversation in case of failure, is an active, interested interlocutor, observes the norms of politeness |
|||
Task accomplished: communication goal achieved; But the topic is not fully disclosed (the aspects indicated in the assignment are not fully disclosed); sociocultural knowledge is mainly used in accordance with the situation of communication. |
Demonstrates the skills and abilities of verbal interaction with a partner: knows how to start, support (in most cases) and end a conversation; observes the order in the exchange of remarks, demonstrates the presence of a problem in understanding the interlocutor, does not always comply with the norms of politeness |
The used lexical and grammatical material corresponds to the set communicative task. Demonstrates a large vocabulary and possession of a variety of grammatical and structures. Lexical and grammatical errors are practically absent (no more than 3 minor language errors are allowed that do not impede understanding) |
||
The task was partially fulfilled: the goal of communication was not fully achieved; the topic is disclosed to a limited extent (not all aspects specified in the assignment are disclosed); sociocultural knowledge is little used in accordance with the situation of communication. |
Demonstrates the lack of formation of skills and abilities of verbal interaction with a partner: knows how to start, but does not seek to maintain a conversation and depends on help from the interlocutor; in most cases does not comply with the norms of politeness |
The used lexical and grammatical material as a whole corresponds to the set communicative task. A sufficient vocabulary is demonstrated, but there is some difficulty in the selection of words and inaccuracies in their use. Only simple grammatical structures are used. Lexical and grammatical errors are allowed (no more than 5 language errors) |
The speech is clear: almost all sounds in the speech stream are pronounced correctly: phonemic errors (changing the meaning of the statement) are not allowed; correct intonation pattern |
|
The task was not completed: the goal of communication was not achieved; the topic is not disclosed; sociocultural knowledge is not used in accordance with the situation of communication |
Can't carry on a conversation |
Insufficient vocabulary, incorrect use of grammatical structures, numerous language errors do not allow to complete the communicative task. |
Speech is almost not perceived by ear due to the incorrect pronunciation of many sounds and numerous phonemic errors. |
Note: The experts evaluate the performance of the assignment by the SC according to the criteria K8-K11:
- K8: Solving a communicative task (content) 0-3 points;
- K9: Interaction with the interlocutor 0-3 points;
- K10: Lexical and grammatical design of speech 0-2 points;
- K11: Pronunciation side of speech: 0-1 points.
If the examinee receives 0 points according to the criterion “Solution of a communicative task (content)”, the entire task is evaluated at 0 points.
Sample essay-reasoning. Option 2. Collection “USE. Russian language - 2015. Standard test tasks 10 options edited by I.P. Vasiliev, Yu.N. Gostev. FIPI approved "...
Sample essay-reasoning. Option 3. Collection “USE. Russian language - 2015. Typical test tasks 10 options, edited by I.P. Vasiliev, Yu.N. Gostev. FIPI approved "...
Sample essay-reasoning. Option 4. Collection “USE. Russian language - 2015. Typical test tasks 10 options, edited by I.P. Vasiliev, Yu.N. Gostev. FIPI approved "...
Sample essay-reasoning. Option 8. Collection “USE. Russian language - 2015. Typical test tasks: 10 options, edited by I.P. Vasiliev, Yu.N. Gostev. FIPI approved "...
Sample essay-reasoning. Option 4. Collection “USE. Russian language - 2015. Typical test tasks: 10 options, edited by I.P. Vasiliev, Yu.N. Gostev. FIPI approved "...
Sample essay-reasoning. Option 7. Collection “USE. Russian language - 2015. Typical test tasks: 10 options, edited by I.P. Vasiliev, Yu.N. Gostev. FIPI approved "...
11 / 03 / 2020Program video: https://yadi.sk/d/n2qahuubEQUwcg The next enrollment for training is scheduled for April 2020. Program professional retraining"Management in Education" is designed to form and expand knowledge and competencies in the field of management theory and practice educational systems, organizations and their divisions in the context of modernization ...
26 / 02 / 2020On February 22, the course "Presentation of Relevant Research in the Field of Education Management" was launched for students of the Master's programs "Management in Education" and "Management of Projects and Programs". Within the framework of the discipline, it is supposed to consider the issues of methodology for preparing for the defense of graduation qualifying works. Issues seminars will be...
17 / 02 / 2020Employees of the Department of Management of Educational Systems named after T.I. Shamova ISGO MSGU took part in the XVII International Conference "Trends in the Development of Education". The main topic of this year's discussions is how to plan and implement effective educational reforms. On February 13 and 14, plenums, round tables and master classes...
13 / 02 / 2020On February 12, within the framework of advanced training at the Moscow State Pedagogical University under the guidance of Professor Natalia Lvovna Galeeva, the directors of schools in Tomsk, Yekaterinburg and Nadym with their teams studied the educational and research space “Environment of Education” at the “Prosveshcheniye” publishing house. We got acquainted with high-tech equipment, specialized programs and advanced technologies....
11 / 02 / 2020February 10, 2020 at ISGO Department of Management of Educational Systems named after. T.I. Shamova received guests who came to the advanced training courses "Intra-school system for assessing the quality of education as a resource for implementing the requirements of the Federal State Educational Standard and the teacher's professional standard." Among the thirty students there were principals and directors of schools...
06 / 02 / 2020February 5, 2020 Associate Professor of the Department of Management of Educational Systems named after T.I. Shamova of the Institute of Social and Humanitarian Education of the Moscow State Pedagogical University Lidia Vasilievna Kozilova acted as an expert of the II Interregional Scientific and Practical Conference “Together we research and design”. The conference is organized by the partner of the department - School No. 2097 of Moscow and...
27 / 01 / 2020For those who want to become an effective education manager! Recruitment for the professional retraining program "Management in Education" is announced. The program "Management in Education" is aimed at developing methods of management activity based on modern theories and management practices; on the formation, development and improvement of students' professional competencies,...
27 / 01 / 2020Despite the big pedagogical experience and interest in working at school, we are increasingly immersed in the scientific space of the university. Participation in 2018 and 2019 in the Week of Remembrance of T.I. Shamova and then in the "Shamov Pedagogical...