The minimum threshold for social studies oge. Evaluation criteria for the entire oge
Translation scale primary points OGE 2016
As in previous years, OGE-2016 (GIA-9) is held on 14 academic subjects. Graduates of the 9th grade take two compulsory exams in Russian language and mathematics, as well as two exams in any of the subjects of their choice. Recall that last year, students could limit themselves to only two compulsory subjects, and take the rest on a voluntary basis.
Primary scores for the performance of the examination work of the OGE are translated into a mark on a 5-point scale. In this regard, the Federal Institute of Pedagogical Measurements (FIPI) published "Recommendations for the use and interpretation of the results of examination papers for conducting the main state exam (OGE) in 2016 ". Regional commissions are given the right to change the scale of transferring points up or down in compulsory subjects.
The points received at the OGE and recalculated into a five-point system affect the grades in the certificate in the corresponding subject. The certificate contains an average indicator between the mark obtained at the OGE and the annual one for the subject. Rounding is done according to the rules of mathematics, that is, 3.5 is rounded to 4, and 4.5 to 5. In addition, the results of the OGE of students can be used when enrolling in specialized classes high school.
Exam grades are available to graduates at their school after the papers have been reviewed and the results approved.
FIPI draws the attention of teachers and school leaders to the fact that the scales for converting primary points into grades on a five-point scale for conducting the OGE are RECOMMENDATIONS.
RUSSIAN LANGUAGE score translation scale
Maximum Points, which can be received by the examinee for the completion of the entire examination work, - 39 points
Minimum threshold: 15 points
* Criteria and explanation for the assessment of the GIA in the Russian language
Criterion |
Explanation for grading |
Points |
GK1. Compliance with spelling rules |
There are no spelling errors, or no more than 1 error was made. |
|
Made 2-3 mistakes |
||
4 errors or more |
||
GK2. Compliance with punctuation rules |
No punctuation errors or no more than 2 errors |
|
Made 3-4 mistakes |
||
5 errors or more |
||
GK3. Compliance with grammar rules |
grammatical errors No, or made 1 mistake |
|
Made 2 mistakes |
||
3 errors or more |
||
GK4. Compliance speech norms |
Speech errors no, or no more than 2 errors |
|
Made 3-4 mistakes |
||
5 errors or more |
MATHEMATICS score transfer scale
Maximum primary score: 32 points . Of these, for the Algebra module - 14 points, for the Geometry module - 11 points, for the Real Mathematics module - 7 points.
Minimum threshold: 8 points (of which at least 3 points in the Algebra module, at least 2 points in the Geometry module and at least 2 points in the Real Mathematics module)
Overcoming this minimum result entitles the graduate to receive, in accordance with curriculum educational institution, the final grade in mathematics (if the study of mathematics was carried out by a graduate as part of an integrated mathematics course) or in algebra and geometry.
The scale for recalculating the primary score for the performance of the examination paper as a whole into a mark mathematics:
The scale for converting the primary score for the implementation of the "Algebra" module into a mark in algebra:
The scale for recalculating the primary score for the implementation of the "Geometry" module into a mark in geometry:
The results of the exam can be used when enrolling students in specialized secondary school classes. Depending on the profile, the guidelines for selection may be as follows:
- for the natural science profile: 18 points(at least 10 in algebra, at least 6 in geometry);
- for the economic profile: 18 points(at least 9 in algebra, 3 in geometry, 5 in real mathematics);
- for the physical and mathematical profile: 19 points(at least 11 in algebra, 7 in geometry).
PHYSICS score transfer scale
Maximum primary score: 40 points
Minimum threshold: 10 points (increased by 1 point)
30 points.
Scale for transferring points in CHEMISTRY
The scale for recalculating the primary score for performing an examination paper without a real experiment
Maximum primary score: 34 points
Minimum threshold: 9 points
The results of the exam can be used when enrolling students in specialized secondary school classes. A guideline for selection in profile classes can be an indicator whose lower limit corresponds to 23 points.
The scale for recalculating the primary score for the performance of the examination paper with real experience
(Demo version of the OGE in chemistry No. 2)
Maximum primary score for work with a real experiment : 38 points
Minimum threshold: 9 points
The results of the exam can be used when enrolling students in specialized secondary school classes. A guideline for selection in profile classes can be an indicator whose lower limit corresponds to 25 points.
BIOLOGY score conversion scale
Maximum primary score: 46 points
Minimum threshold: 13 points
The results of the exam can be used when enrolling students in specialized secondary school classes. A guideline for selection in profile classes can be an indicator whose lower limit corresponds to 33 points.
GEOGRAPHY score transfer scale
Maximum primary score: 32 points
Minimum threshold: 12 points
The results of the exam can be used when enrolling students in specialized secondary school classes. A guideline for selection in profile classes can be an indicator whose lower limit corresponds to 24 points.
SOCIAL STUDIES score transfer scale
Maximum primary score: 39 points
Minimum threshold: 15 points
The results of the exam can be used when enrolling students in specialized secondary school classes. A guideline for selection in profile classes can be an indicator whose lower limit corresponds to 30 points.
HISTORY score transfer scale
Maximum primary score: 44 points
Minimum threshold: 13 points
The results of the exam can be used when enrolling students in specialized secondary school classes. A guideline for selection in profile classes can be an indicator whose lower limit corresponds to 32 points.
Scale for transferring points for LITERATURE
Maximum primary score: 23 points
Minimum threshold: 7 points
The results of the exam can be used when enrolling students in specialized secondary school classes. A guideline for selection in profile classes can be an indicator whose lower limit corresponds to 15 points.
Score transfer scale for INFORMATICS and ICT
Maximum primary score: 22 points
Minimum threshold: 5 points
The results of the exam can be used when enrolling students in specialized secondary school classes. A guideline for selection in profile classes can be an indicator whose lower limit corresponds to 15 points.
Scale for transferring scores in FOREIGN LANGUAGE
(ENGLISH, GERMAN, FRENCH, SPANISH)
Maximum primary score: 70 points
Minimum threshold: 29 points
The results of the exam can be used when enrolling students in specialized secondary school classes. A guideline for selection in profile classes can be an indicator whose lower limit corresponds to 56 points.
At the OGE - 2017 in chemistry, ninth-graders will be offered 22 tasks or 24 tasks (depending on the type of exam), for solving each of them you can get from 1 to 5 points. Maximum amount primary points will be 34 (if the OGE is submitted without an experimental part) or 38 (if experimental tasks are performed). The tables below indicate maximum amount points that can be obtained for each of the tasks.
Table 1. OGE without experimental part
Table 2. OGE with laboratory work
The scores obtained are translated into traditional grades. If a ninth grader receives less than 9 primary points, the OGE in chemistry is considered not passed. To get an "excellent" grade, it is not necessary to solve all the exam tasks.
Table 3. Converting the primary scores of the OGE into grades (OGE without the experimental part)
Table 4. Converting primary OGE scores to grades (OGE with laboratory work)
Do not forget that the recalculation scale is changing: in 2016 it was different, in 2018 it will also change slightly (at least due to a change in the structure of the test and the number of tasks). Specified figures valid only for 2017 and only for the OGE in chemistry.
The Main State Exam (OGE) is a test for every ninth grader! The exam is mandatory for all high school graduates, but ninth graders who want to continue their education in colleges are especially diligently preparing for it, because for admission it is necessary to demonstrate a high level of knowledge and, if possible, get the highest possible score.
It's time for future graduates to learn as much as possible about how exam papers are checked, and what the scale for converting OGE test scores into traditional grades will be in 2019.
What will the OGE look like in 2019?
If a USE reform By 2019, it will almost be completed and no cardinal changes are expected in KIMs for 11-graders, then the OGE is only entering the reform stage. In the last academic year 2017-2018 in again the number of items brought to final certification, and in 2019, students will have to take a total of 5 exams:
- 2 compulsory: Russian language and mathematics;
- 3 to choose from disciplines such as: physics, chemistry, history, computer science, foreign language, social studies, biology, geography and literature.
There is no official information about the introduction of the 6th exam yet. But earlier it was said that by 2020 the total number of items to be handed over will reach six.
The choice of a profile subject should not be random, because the result of the OGE directly affects the grade in the certificate and is the main selection criterion for profile classes.
Checking exam papers of the OGE
In 2019, ninth-graders from all regions of the Russian Federation will perform the same tasks, because, unlike in previous years, today the process of developing a single bank of tasks is actively underway, which will allow assessing the real level of knowledge of students.
As in 2018, 9th grade graduates will write papers on the basis of their educational institution which significantly increases the chances of a good result. The examination of the exam papers of the OGE, as before, will be carried out by school teachers who have sufficient qualifications to become an expert of the GIA.
By analogy with the exam, all works will be checked by two experts. If the opinions of specialists differ significantly, then a third expert will be involved in the verification process, whose opinion will become decisive.
If the student does not agree with the assessment of the experts, he can appeal and the work will be rechecked again, but by completely different experts who are part of the appeal commission.
During the check, for each correctly completed task, primary scores, which are then converted into a 5-point assessment familiar to schoolchildren.
Point conversion scale
Although FIPI has developed a unified standardized scale for converting primary OGE scores into grades, in 2019 (as before) other norms can be officially approved at the local level, taking into account regional characteristics.
So, for 2018, the following score transfer tables were approved, which with a high degree of probability will be relevant in the 2018-2019 academic year.
After reviewing the document, you can see that when grading in the Russian language and mathematics (all levels), not only the total total score is taken into account.
So, in Russian, to get an estimate:
- "4" you need to score at least 4 points for literacy with 25-33 total points;
- "5" - at least 6 points for literacy with 34-39 total.
Special requirements for the evaluation of works in mathematics are dictated by the fact that two subjects are submitted for the exam: algebra and geometry. Accordingly, the student must not only type minimum threshold, but to demonstrate a certain level of knowledge in each of the main school disciplines in the course "mathematics".
The threshold for entry into specialized classes and colleges also differs depending on the chosen direction:
Russian language | |
Maths (natural science and economic profile) | |
Maths (Fizmat profile) | |
Social science | |
Informatics | |
Literature | |
Foreign language | |
Biology | |
Geography | |
(with experiment) | |
(no experiment) |
The general table for interpreting the OGE test scores in all subjects in 2019 will look like this:
Residents of regions where, in 2019, when determining the results of the OGE, the recommended unified scale for transferring points for graduates of grade 9 is taken as the basis, can also use a convenient online calculator, which can be found on the website 4ege.ru.
Retake the OGE
In 2018 year OGE passed more than 1.3 million ninth-graders, most of whom coped with the tests without any problems. But, as always, there are those who received an "unsatisfactory" rating. What awaits such ninth graders? There are several options for the development of events:
- Retake, which allows students who have no more than 2 unsatisfactory results.
- Break long academic year, during which the student gets the opportunity to better prepare for the exam (perhaps individually studying with teachers).
The examination work of the OGE in the Russian language consists of three parts.
The third part of the work contains a creative task (Task 15), which checks communicative competence schoolchildren, in particular, the ability to build their own statement in accordance with a given type of speech.
Detailed criteria for evaluating the essay of the OGE are presented in detail in the document published on the FIPI website:
You can briefly get acquainted with the criteria for evaluating the essay of the OGE in the demo version in the Russian language.
Task 15.1. Criteria for evaluating an essay - reasoning on a linguistic topic
Table 1
№ | Criteria for evaluating an essay-reasoning on the linguistic theme (15.1) |
Points |
C 1 K1 | Reasonable response | |
The examinee gave reasoning at the theoretical level. There are no factual errors related to understanding the thesis | 2 | |
The examinee gave reasoning at the theoretical level. One factual error was made with understanding of the thesis |
1 | |
The examinee gave reasoning at the theoretical level. Two or more factual errors were made related to the understanding of the thesis, or thesis is not proven or reasoning is given outside the context of the task, or the thesis is proven at the household level | 0 | |
C 1 K2 | Presence of examples-arguments | |
from text, correctly indicating their role in the text | 3 | |
The examinee gave two examples-arguments from text, but did not indicate their role in the text, or gave two examples from text, indicating the role in the text of one of them, or gave one example from text, indicating its role in the text | 2 | |
The examinee gave one example-argument from text, without specifying his role in the text |
1 | |
The examinee did not give a single example-argument illustrating the thesis, or the examinee gave examples-arguments not from the read text | 0 | |
S 1 K3 | ||
2 | ||
butand/or | 1 | |
but and/or | 0 | |
C 1 K4 | The compositional harmony of the work | |
|
2 | |
The work is characterized by compositional harmony and completeness but |
1 | |
0 | ||
The maximum number of points for an essay according to the criteria C 1 K1–C 1 K4 |
9 |
An essay-reasoning on a linguistic topic can be written by the examinee, based on both general cultural experience and philological knowledge.
Criteria for evaluating an essay-reasoning on a topic related to text analysis
table 2
№ | Criteria for evaluating an essay-reasoning on a topic related to text analysis (15.2) | Points |
C 2 K1 | Understanding the meaning of a piece of text | |
The examinee gave a correct explanation of the content of the fragment. No errors in interpretation | 2 | |
The examinee gave a generally correct explanation of the content of the passage, but made one mistake in his interpretation | 1 | |
The examinee gave an incorrect explanation of the content of the text fragment, or the examinee made two or more mistakes in interpreting the content of the text fragment, or there is no explanation of the content of the fragment in the work of the examinee | 0 | |
C 2 K2 | Presence of examples-arguments | |
Examinee led from text two examples-arguments that correspond to the explanation of the content of this fragment | 3 | |
Examinee led from text one example is an argument that matches the explanation of the content of the given fragment | 2 | |
The examinee gave an example(s)-argument(s) not from the read text | 1 | |
The examinee did not give a single example-argument explaining the content of this fragment, or the examinee cited the quote given in the task or part of it as an example-argument | 0 | |
C 2 K3 | Semantic integrity, speech coherence and sequence of composition | |
The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, speech coherence and sequence of presentation: - there are no logical errors, the sequence of presentation is not broken; - there are no violations of paragraph division of the text in the work | 2 | |
The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, coherence and consistency of presentation, but one logical error and/or there is one violation of paragraph articulation of the text in the work | 1 | |
In the work of the examinee, a communicative intent is visible, but more than one logical error was made, and/or there are two cases of violation of paragraph articulation of the text | 0 | |
C 2 K4 | Compositional harmony | |
The work is characterized by compositional harmony and completeness, there are no errors in the construction of the text | 2 | |
The work is characterized by compositional harmony and completeness, but one mistake was made in the construction of the text | 1 | |
There are two or more errors in the construction of the text in the work | 0 | |
The maximum number of points for an essay according to criteria C 2 K1–C 2 K4 | 9 |
Assessment Criteria for Assignment 15.3
Table 3
№ | Criteria for evaluating an essay-reasoning on a topic related to text analysis (15.3) | Points |
C 3 K1 | Interpretation of the meaning of the word | |
The examinee (in one form or another in any part of the essay) gave a definition and commented on it | 2 | |
The examinee (in one form or another in any part of the essay) gave a definition, but didn't comment on it | 1 | |
The examinee gave the wrong definition, or there is no interpretation of the word in the work of the examinee | 0 | |
C 3 K2 | Presence of examples-arguments | |
The examinee gave two examples-arguments: one example-argument was given from the read text, and the second - from life experience, or the examinee gave two examples-arguments from the read text | 3 | |
The examinee gave one example-argument from the read text | 2 | |
The examinee gave an example (s) - argument (s) from life experience | 1 | |
The examinee did not give a single example-argument | 0 | |
C 3 K3 | Semantic integrity, speech coherence and sequence of composition | |
The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, speech coherence and consistency of presentation: - there are no logical errors, the sequence of presentation is not broken; - there are no violations of paragraph division of the text in the work | 2 | |
The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, coherence and consistency of presentation, but one logical error and/or there is one violation of paragraph articulation of the text in the work | 1 | |
In the work of the examinee, a communicative intent is visible, but more than one logical error was made, and/or there are two cases of violation of paragraph articulation of the text | 0 | |
C 3 K4 | Compositional harmony | |
The work is characterized by compositional harmony and completeness, there are no errors in the construction of the text |
2 | |
The work is characterized by compositional harmony and completeness but one mistake was made in the construction of the text |
1 | |
There are two or more errors in the construction of the text in the work | 0 | |
The maximum number of points for an essay according to criteria C 3 K1–C 3 K4 | 9 |
It is important that the student is offered 3 options for writing. In each option, a different setting (research, analytical, value) can be implemented, which corresponds to both different types 6 perception of the text, and different forms student's personal orientation.
Availability different options The composition contributes to the development of the competence of the responsible choice of the student, allows the teacher, when preparing for the exam, to implement the whole variety of teaching aids aimed at the development of speech. At the same time, it is no coincidence that special attention is paid to the ability to argue the positions of one’s work using the text read: cultivating a culture of evidence-based reasoned reasoning is the most important task modern school. It is also important to note that argumentation is an integrated indicator of the depth and accuracy of understanding the source text and the ability to functionally use the extracted information to solve certain communication goals.
It is significant that the ability to argue one's own statements is insufficiently developed among 11th grade graduates. New form examination work for graduates of the basic school contributes to a more active work of the teacher in this direction already in the basic school.
On June 6, 2017, Russian ninth graders will write an important compulsory exam- OGE in mathematics. Strictly speaking, testing of schoolchildren is called GIA, but it is carried out in two formats: the main State exam(OGE) and state final exam(for children with disabilities, abbreviated GVE).
Articles about answers in other subjects:
- Answers to the OGE in English (May 26 and 27, 2017)
- Answers to the OGE in Spanish (May 26 and 27, 2017)
- Answers to the OGE in French (May 26 and 27, 2017)
- Answers to the OGE in German (May 26 and 27, 2017)
- Answers to the OGE in the Russian language (May 30, 2017)
- Answers to the OGE in history (June 1, 2017)
- Answers to the OGE in biology (June 1, 2017)
- Answers to the OGE in Literature (June 1, 2017)
- Answers to the OGE in physics (June 1 and 3, 2017)
- Answers to the OGE in Informatics (June 3 and 8, 2017)
- Answers to the OGE in social studies (June 8, 2017)
- Answers to the OGE in chemistry (June 8, 2017)
- Answers to the OGE in geography (June 8, 2017)
Changes in the OGE 2017 in mathematics
No significant changes were made to the OGE 2017 in mathematics. But this does not mean at all that you should rely on the advice of those who have already passed the OGE and try to find 2016 KIMS in the Network. Every year, the exam does not repeat the same type of questions, because a whole group of highly qualified experts is working on the tasks for the GIA.
The OGE exam in mathematics consists of two parts. The first is aimed at checking the achievement of the level of basic training, the second - at identifying knowledge of the material for more high levels required for admission to technical universities. The first part of the OGE consists of three modules - "Algebra", "Geometry" and "Real Mathematics". The second level of the exam is testing in the sections "Algebra" and "Geometry".
In the first part of the OGE in mathematics, the simplest questions are provided: the choice of one or more answer options from the proposed ones, tasks with a short answer and assignments for correspondence.
The Algebra module of the OGE in mathematics contains tasks in arithmetic, algebraic expressions and their transformations, equations and inequalities, functions and graphs, numerical sequences.
In the "Geometry" module of the OGE in mathematics - geometric shapes and their properties, measurement geometric shapes, coordinates, vectors.
The second part of the OGE in mathematics is needed to divide schoolchildren with a good level of knowledge according to the levels of preparation. In these tasks, you need to show on the form of the OGE all the steps for solving problems, arranged in increasing complexity.
Answers to the OGE 2017 in mathematics
If you type in the search engine “Answers to the OGE on June 6, 2016”, then many sites or pages on social networks will appear that allegedly have the original KIMs of 2017. All you need to do is to transfer a certain amount to the scammers, and then, perhaps, you will become the owner of the answers to the exam OGE assignments(Unified State Examination) in mathematics and enter the university of your dreams ...
Have you already imagined the happy moment of admission? It's too early to rejoice. Hundreds of swindlers profit from dishonest graduates, who simply earn money in this way. It is unlikely that you will get anything at all after you pay for "real answers to the OGE GIA on June 6, 2017." Maximum - official demo version KIMov 2017 or typical examination option OGE.
Download the key to solve all tests right now!