The role of the guard in 1725 1762. Klyuchevsky on palace coups
In history Russia XVIII century is a phenomenon that has no analogues in life European countries the same period. This phenomenon is a special political role of the Russian. It is not possible to fully understand the period Russian history from Peter I to Paul I, and even to Nicholas II, without examining political history guards. Meanwhile, this work has not yet been done. The social composition of the guard, the nature and dynamics of its change have not been studied with sufficient accuracy. And this lack of knowledge gives rise to historical myths.
We are talking about political history, because after Poltava victory and the Prut defeat for many decades of the 18th century, the guard did not take any active part in hostilities. The sphere of activity of the guards regiments was politics.
The decisive force in the palace coups turned out to be the guards, a privileged part of the regular army created by Peter (these are the famous Semenovsky and Preobrazhensky regiments, in the 1730s two new ones, Izmailovsky and Horse Guards, were added to them). Her participation decided the outcome of the case: on whose side the guard was, that group won. The guard was not only a privileged part of the Russian army, it was a representative of the whole class (nobles), from whose midst it was almost exclusively formed and whose interests it represented.
Creating a guard in 1692, Peter wanted to oppose it to the archers - privileged infantry regiments Moscow tsars, who by the end of the 17th century began to interfere in politics. "Janissaries!" Peter called them so contemptuously. He had reasons for hatred - forever he, a ten-year-old boy, remembered the terrible Streltsy revolt of 1682, when his closest relatives died on the spears of the archers. The guard is the first and, perhaps, the most perfect creation of Peter. These two regiments - six thousand bayonets - could compete with the best regiments of Europe in combat training and military spirit. Guards for Peter was a support in the struggle for power and in the retention of power. According to contemporaries, Peter often said that among the guards there was not a single one to whom he would not dare to entrust his life. The guard for Peter was a "forge of personnel." Guards officers and sergeants carried out any orders of the king - from the organization of the mining industry to control over the actions of the highest generals. The Guard has always known its duty - it was brought up that way. It seemed to Peter that ideal model, focusing on which he dreamed of creating his own "regular" state - a clear, obedient, strong militarily, working smoothly and conscientiously. And the guards idolized their creator. And for good reason. It was not only about honors and privileges. Peter managed to inspire the Semenovites and Preobrazhenians with a sense of participation in the construction of a new state. The guardsman not only was, but also realized himself as a statesman. And this self-awareness, completely new for an ordinary Russian person, gave the Petrine guardsman extraordinary strength.
Sagittarius of Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich was also. But he stood for tradition, for the inviolability or slow evolution of the state life, merging for him with the life of the home, his ideal was the preservation of the life around him, its reference values. The Petrovsky Guardsman felt like a creator of something new and unprecedented. Unlike the archer, he was much less connected with everyday life. He was committed to the future. He lived with a feeling of constant impulse, movement, improvement. He was a man of reform as a life principle. It was this attitude and self-awareness, and not a shaved chin and a European uniform, that fundamentally distinguished the Peter's guardsman from the pre-Petrine soldier.
But before the founder and first colonel of the Preobrazhensky Regiment closed his eyes, his favorites in green uniforms turned into new Janissaries.
Perfectly equipped, exemplarily armed and trained guardsmen have always been the pride and support of the Russian throne. Their courage, steadfastness, selflessness many times decided the fate of battles, campaigns, entire wars in favor of Russian weapons.
But there is another, less heroic page in the annals of the imperial guard. The guardsmen, these handsome men, duelists, red tape, spoiled by the attention of metropolitan and provincial ladies, constituted a special privileged military unit Russian army with its traditions, customs, psychology. The main duty of the guard was to protect the peace and security of the autocrat, the royal family and the court. Standing on the clock outside and inside the royal palace, they saw the wrong side of court life. Favorites sneaked past them into the royal bedrooms, they heard gossip and saw ugly quarrels, without which the court could not live. The guardsmen did not experience reverent awe of the courtiers glittering with gold and diamonds, they missed the magnificent ceremonies - for them all this was familiar, and they had their own, often impartial, opinion about everything.
It is also important that the guardsmen had an exaggerated idea of their role in the life of the court, the capital, and Russia. Peter I created a force that throughout the 18th century acted as the main arbiter of the destinies of monarchs and pretenders to the throne. Guards regiments, noble in composition, were the closest support to the throne. They represented that real armed force at the court, which could contribute to both the enthronement and the deposition of kings. Therefore, the rulers tried in every possible way to enlist the support of the guard, showered her with signs of attention and favors. A special relationship was established between the guards and the monarch: the guards barracks and royal palace were closely related to each other. Service in the guard was not profitable - it required a lot of money, but it opened up good career prospects, the road to political ambition and adventurism, so typical of the 18th century with its dizzying ups and downs of "random" people.
Nevertheless, it often turned out that the "fierce Russian Janissaries" could be successfully controlled. With flattery, promises, money, clever court businessmen were able to direct the red-hot stream of the Guards in the right direction, so that the mustachioed handsome men did not even suspect their miserable role as puppets in the hands of intriguers and adventurers. However, like a double-edged sword, the guard was also dangerous for those who used its services. Emperors and the first nobles often became hostages of an unbridled and capricious armed crowd of guardsmen. And this ominous role in Russian history of the guards was shrewdly understood by the French envoy in St. Petersburg, Jean Campredon, who wrote to his master Louis XV immediately after the accession to the throne of Catherine I: "The decision of the guards is the law here." And it was true, the 18th century entered Russian culture as "the century of palace coups." And all these coups were made by the hands of the guards.
On January 28, 1725, for the first time, the guardsmen played their political role in the drama of Russian history, immediately after the death of the first emperor, they brought the widow of Peter the Great to the throne, bypassing other heirs. This was the first independent performance of the guard as a political force.
When Catherine I fell dangerously ill in May 1727, officials of the highest government institutions gathered to resolve the issue of a successor: the Supreme Privy Council, the Senate, the Synod, and the presidents of the collegiums. Majors of the guards appeared among them, as if the officers of the guards constituted a special political corporation, without whose assistance such an important issue could not be resolved. Unlike other guard corporations - Roman Praetorians, Turkish Janissaries - the Russian Guard turned into political sk corporation .
The historian Klyuchevsky, who did not specifically deal with this issue, sensed the essence of the phenomenon. Having given in a few sentences a cursory overview of the “epoch of palace coups”, he further formulates the fundamental provisions: “This is the participation of the guard in public affairs was extremely important, having a powerful influence on its political mood. Initially an obedient tool in the hands of its leaders, it then becomes an independent mover of events, intervening in politics on its own initiative. Palace coups were a preparatory political school for her, developed in her certain political tastes, instilled in her a certain political way of thinking, created a mood. The Guards barracks is a counterbalance and sometimes an open opponent of the Senate and the Supreme Privy Council.
This is a wise passage. However, there is something to object to here. Firstly, the guards went through a certain political school under Peter. By the era of palace coups, she came already as a "political corporation." Her claims to resolve issues within the competence of government institutions - the Senate and the Supreme Council, were based on memories of the role that Peter assigned to her in the last decade of his reign, the role of a controlling and regulating force, accountable only to the king.
Secondly, it is unlikely that in 1725 and 1727 the guard was an “obedient instrument” in the hands of Menshikov and Buturlin. She was an "obedient instrument" - an ideal instrument - in the hands of her creator, and with his death immediately became a force in her own right. The guard followed Menshikov and Buturlin because their program at that moment was really organically close to the guards: Catherine seemed to the Preobrazhenians and Semenovites a guarantor of literally following the plans of the first emperor.
The guard chose not just a reigning person, she chose a principle. Moreover, the guard did not choose between Peter the Great and pre-Petrine Russia, but it made its choice in January 1725 between two trends in the political reform of the country - a moderate but undoubted movement towards limiting autocracy and the inevitable increase in freedom in the country, on the one hand, and further development and strengthening the military-bureaucratic state based on total slavery, on the other.
Guards in 1725 chose the second option.
"History of mankind. Russia / graphic designer O. N. Ivanova.”: Folio; Kharkiv; 2013
RUSSIA In the XVIII century. AFTER PETER I
A series of rulers before Catherine II.
The role of the guard in palace coups
After Peter I, his wife Catherine I ruled for two years, and after her death, the grandson of Peter I, Peter II.
Peter I did not have time to decide who would be his heir. Most of all the rights to the throne had his grandson (the son of the executed Alexei), the young Peter. But among the nobles, parties were formed that tried to put on the throne a king that was beneficial to them. Menshikov, Yaguzhinsky and others contributed to the coming to power of Catherine I. The troops gathered around the palace were especially convinced by the Senate, the Synod and the generals. Catherine was an intelligent, but uneducated woman, according to one foreign ambassador, when she ascended the throne, she could neither read nor write. But three months later she learned to sign government papers. In fact, Menshikov was the ruler under her, while the empress herself spent time in magnificent feasts and festivities. important event her reign was the establishment of the Supreme Privy Council to decide the most important state affairs.
Catherine died in 1727 and appointed Peter II Alekseevich as his successor. Passions boiled around the 11-year-old Emperor Peter II. Initially, he was greatly influenced by Menshikov, who wanted to marry him to his daughter. Then he annoyed the boy with his strictness and, on the advice of his enemies, was exiled to distant Berezovo. The huge fortune of Prince and Generalissimo Alexander Danilovich was taken away. The princes Dolgoruky now had a strong influence on the tsar, who agreed on the wedding of Peter II and Catherine Dolgoruky. But suddenly the monarch fell ill with smallpox. In January 1730, on the day of the planned wedding, Peter II died.
Among the candidates for the throne was the daughter of Peter I, Elizabeth, but she was born before the official marriage to Catherine and was considered illegitimate. Therefore, they settled on the daughter of Ivan V, brother of Peter I, Anna. In addition, court groups sought to establish on the throne a ruler that was beneficial to them in order to receive some benefits, privileges, strengthen their position, etc. Among the members of the Supreme Privy Council (“supreme leaders”), an idea arose to limit the power of the king, “to make yourself feel better”, “ give yourself the will." They offered the throne to Anna, but with the condition that they sign an agreement - not to decide the most important matters without the consent of the "supreme leaders". On the one hand, theoretically, the limitation of autocracy could be positive. But a very narrow, oligarchic circle of advisers was appointed. The danger would be too great to use the Council as an instrument for narrowly selfish purposes. This body had very little support among the nobles. And Anna soon abandoned the obligation.
After the death of Peter II in 1730, the niece of Peter I, Anna Ivanovna, who lived in the Baltics, ascended the throne. The guards began to play an increasing role in the appointment (and then overthrow) of emperors and empresses, as well as influential dignitaries. These privileged troops consisted of nobles, even the rank and file here were nobles. To a certain extent, they reflected the mood of the upper class of the whole country, but, mainly, they began to turn into a force supporting this or that party, a person capable of carrying out a palace coup.
From the Baltics, Anna brought her entourage, among which her favorite (favorite) Biron was the main one. Anna's reign is inextricably linked with the growing influence of foreigners ("Germans"), many of whom were distinguished by rudeness, arrogance, greed, and disregard for everything Russian. Arbitrariness increased, political arrests and executions increased. This whole regime caused great discontent among the Russians, both the aristocracy and ordinary people. However, Anna happily reigned for ten years. After her death, palace coups began again. Formally, the baby Ivan Antonovich (Ivan VI), the great-grandson of Ivan V (brother of Peter I), was the tsar for almost a year. Then he was deposed, and the daughter of Peter I, Elizabeth, ascended the throne.
Anna, dying, left herself a successor: the infant son of her niece Anna Leopoldovna, who was married to the German prince Anton-Ulrich of Brunswick. But the regent, i.e. the actual ruler until the king came of age, should have been the same hated Biron. For the nobles, who were looking forward to the departure of the temporary worker, it was unbearable. It didn’t even help that Biron began his reign with favors: he canceled a number of death sentences, reduced taxes, etc. A conspiracy arose, the soul of which was another “German”, Field Marshal Minich. Biron was arrested and in April 1741 exiled forever to Pelym. His young mother Anna became the regent under the tsar. But she didn't have long to rule. At the end of November 1741, the guards again made a coup and elevated their beloved Elizabeth to the throne (Ivan VI Antonovich was imprisoned in a fortress). Unlike her mother, Elizabeth received an education, but she herself understood that she was not prepared to govern the state. She was not a particularly distant woman, sometimes rude and using a strong word. The queen was very fond of fun and balls. After her death, 15 thousand (!) Dresses that belonged to her remained. However, she was also distinguished by great piety, very strictly observing fasts. During the conspiracy, she gave her word not to execute anyone by death and kept it. It is believed that she was married in secret to Alexei Razumovsky.
The reign of Elizabeth lasted a long time, 20 years. She did a lot for the development of Russian industry and culture, greatly reduced the influence of foreigners at court. She was succeeded by her nephew, the grandson of Peter I from his daughter Anna and the German Duke of Holstein, Peter III. This was a stupid person. He turned down the opportunity to gain benefits for Russia as a result of victories in a difficult war with Prussia. German influence again increased. As a result, the guards again made a coup and in 1762 put his wife Catherine II on the throne. Unlike previous coups, for the first time a conspiracy arose not after the death of the king, but with a living adult emperor. For the first time, the emperor was also killed.
Peter III considered the Prussian king Frederick II a model for himself, did not recognize anything Russian. He put the benefits of his tiny state in Germany above the interests huge Russia. His development is evidenced by the fact that one of his favorite pastimes was playing with soldiers. One day, Catherine, entering his room, saw with horror that he had hung a rat, which, according to him, committed a criminal offense: it ate the heads of two soldiers. Peter tyrannized his wife and humiliated in every possible way. The latter, although she was also German, but with early years imbued with the life of Russia, was much more intelligent and educated. The guards loved her. Having managed to wean themselves from the dominance of foreigners, many officers could not restrain their indignation at the new order. The Orlov brothers became the center of the conspiracy. Peter III was deposed and later killed.
^ The foreign policy of the country from Peter I to Catherine II did not differ in too great achievements. However, it was possible to defend the conquests of Peter the Great in the war with Sweden and even push the northern border somewhat. The influence of Russia on the internal affairs of Sweden has also increased, where our government has constantly supported one of the parties that stood for peace with Russia. The influence on Poland was also noticeable, the strength of which was constantly decreasing due to the willfulness of the gentry. In alliance with Austria in the 30s, Russia fought with Turkey. It was possible to achieve military successes, but there were almost no territorial ones. Even greater victories were achieved in the seven-year European war, in which our country was drawn into, dissatisfied with the strengthening of Prussia. A particularly outstanding success was in 1759 at the Battle of Kunersdorf, where Count Peter Saltykov inflicted a terrible defeat on the famous Frederick II. However, the death of Elizabeth and the stupidity of Peter III deprived Russia of the fruits of victories. Nevertheless, the international prestige of the country has increased dramatically.
^ Russo-Turkish Wars II half of XVIII V.
annexation of Ukraine and Belarus
Much more successful were the wars under Catherine II. Two wars with Turkey played a huge role. The first was from 1768 to 1774.
Turkey itself was the initiator of it, and the reason was the internal struggle of the parties in Poland, in whose affairs Russia had interfered since the time of Peter, mainly over the election of kings convenient for her and on the issue of protecting the Orthodox. In Poland, the main religion was Catholicism, but, in addition to the Orthodox, there were also Protestants. Prussia stood up for the latter. Both of them were called dissidents. A confederation of pans gathered in Poland, which incited Turkey to war. The Crimeans devastated the area inhabited by Serbian immigrants, New Serbia.
The Russians won a number of brilliant victories. Pyotr Alexandrovich Rumyantsev especially distinguished himself, twice defeating the many times superior forces of the Turks and Tatars at Larga and Cahul. The Russian fleet sailed from the Baltic to the Mediterranean Sea and inflicted a terrible defeat on the Turkish fleet in the Chesme Bay. The war was complicated by the Pugachev uprising. In 1774, the Kyuchuk-Kainarji peace treaty, which was beneficial for Russia, was signed. The lands between the Bug and the Dniester were attached to the sea coast, lands to the Kuban. The freedom of Russian navigation was affirmed. And most importantly, the Crimean Khanate was declared independent of Turkey. In 1783, taking advantage of the internal turmoil in the Crimea, Russia annexed the peninsula to itself. Finally, this robber nest, from which our Motherland was tormented for centuries, was liquidated!
Because of the Crimea, the second war with Turkey (1787-1791) began, in which Russia had an ally - Austria. This time, the commander Alexander Vasilyevich Suvorov especially distinguished himself. He severely defeated the Turks at Focsani and Rymnik, took the impregnable fortress of Izmail. Revealed himself and new Black Sea Fleet under the command of Admiral Fyodor Ushakov.
The war took the country by surprise, “trouble followed disaster: crop failure, high cost, illness in the army; a terrible storm smashed the newborn Sevastopol fleet. And then the Swedes attacked. However, they failed again. In 1791, peace was concluded with Turkey in Iasi: another part of the Black Sea coast went to Russia.
In the 70s, and then in the 90s, Russia, together with Prussia and Austria, participated in the so-called partitions of Poland, of which there were three. As a result, the once huge and powerful Polish state ceased to exist. It weakened due to the fact that the Polish noblemen-pans were completely unwilling to sacrifice their rights in favor of the state, and the three predatory neighbors took advantage of Poland's weakness. The Ukrainian and Belarusian lands, as well as Lithuania, went to Russia. The reunification of the East Slavic lands with Russia from a national point of view had a positive significance, although they were also affected by the general shortcomings of the tsarist regime.
Russia, in fact, did not seek divisions, since it preferred to have a weak neighbor as a buffer between itself and strong powers. But Prussia actively insisted. Therefore, it seemed impossible not to participate. The reason for the first section of 1772 was an attempt by the Polish nobles and the king to take advantage of Russian-Turkish war. For the second, in 1793, one of the warring parties in Poland appealed to Catherine for help (a well-known technique). For the third - the uprising in Poland under the leadership of Kosciuszko. The Poles were defeated, Suvorov took the suburbs of Warsaw, and in 1795 Poland was gone.
^ Main directions domestic policy in the 18th century
State and other reforms
Palace coups and the struggle of court parties strongly influenced internal affairs. However, if we consider this policy in general terms, we can single out the following directions: 1. Continued colonization of vast expanses. Now they began to invite foreigners: Serbs, Germans, etc. The most important thing in the development of new lands was the movement to the south after the liquidation of the Crimean Khanate. The lands in Novorossia and Tavria (new regions) were beautiful, with the gaining of security, settlers went there. New cities and ports are being founded: military - Sevastopol, commercial - Odessa, etc. Trade through the Black Sea is also growing. There is a colonization of the Volga and Trans-Volga regions, which was facilitated by the research expedition of Pallas. The colonization of America (Alaska) also begins, and Russian America appears by the end of the century. 2. There is a process of expanding the rights of the nobility, partly of the merchants and the other elite of the townspeople, and at the same time the peasants are finally enslaved and deprived of all civil rights. The position of the Cossacks is also changing, which becomes a military service class. 3. The promotion of the development of industry and trade, the development of credit institutions (banks), the improvement monetary circulation. 4. There are reforms in the field of state administration. Under Catherine II, the former division of the state was changed. Instead of large and unequal provinces in terms of population, 50 provinces were created with the number of inhabitants from 300 to 400 thousand, which were divided into counties from 20 to 30 thousand people. For the cities, the City Regulations were adopted, which improved their self-government.
The separation of administration from the court was very important (before, all this was combined, leading to great abuses). Now the court, in addition, itself was divided into criminal, civil and state. This, as well as the adoption of a number of new laws, improved the judiciary. An important event in the first years of Catherine's reign was the Commission for the development of a new Code (instead of the one adopted by Alexei Mikhailovich in 1649), in fact, something like a new Zemsky Sobor. However, they failed to make a new Code, although a number of the Commission's developments were later implemented.
Under Elizabeth Petrovna, recruiting was facilitated, and the general survey earth. Much has been done for the development of medicine and education. It developed even more under Catherine. Smallpox vaccination was started, pharmacies were introduced, many gymnasiums and other schools were opened.
^ Characteristics of Catherine II. Prominent State
figures and commanders of her reign. Fight against dissent
Catherine II of all the rulers after Peter I was the most prominent. No wonder she received the honorary title of Great. A princess from a seedy German principality, she, by the will of fate, was married to the heir to the Russian throne and managed to understand and love her new homeland.
From the age of 14, being in Russia, she mastered both the Russian language and Russian culture well, and later did a lot for its development. She wrote about Russia in one of her letters: "... this state has done extremely much for me, and I think that all my own abilities ... are hardly sufficient for me to pay it off." She was an educated and literary talented woman, she wrote a lot works of art, research on laws and government. For a long time she encouraged the emergence of magazines and book publishing, but the spread of the first revolutionary ideas and books forced her to change course and introduce censorship with a series of decrees.
As already mentioned, under Catherine the state did a lot for the development of education, morality, culture and science. Such a government, when the monarch encourages the development of these areas, takes care of good morals and the well-being of the people, is called enlightened absolutism. It can be assumed that the reign of Catherine in many ways fits this regime, but the halo of an enlightened empress was spoiled by the strengthening of serfdom and popular uprisings.
She was a smart and energetic woman, a cunning, good actress. Catherine was distinguished by her love of power, but she knew how to attract people, use their talents, and behave diplomatically. Here she was completely different from her husband and son, and other rulers.
Catherine went down in history with her love interests, of which there were many. However, this loving woman knew how to choose not just lovers, but statesmen who served the Fatherland. Among her favorites, Prince Grigory Potemkin, a warrior, diplomat, organizer, stood out in particular. An imperious, rude, but intelligent and energetic person, he took on big tasks and knew how to solve them. Taking advantage of his closeness to the empress, he (and others, of course) did not forget about his pocket, appropriated and stole state funds. He went down in history with his famous "Potemkin villages", which he painted instead of built.
An outstanding figure was the strongman Count Grigory Orlov, who, together with his brothers, made a coup for Catherine and for a long time was her favorite. It was a warrior, a diplomat who carried out the most secret orders of the empress. In 1771, he managed to calm down Moscow, where the “plague riot” began, and reduce the consequences of the epidemic. Nevertheless, they were huge: 100 thousand people died from the plague.
The outstanding commanders of this time have already been mentioned - P. A. Rumyantsev, the first holder of the Order of George I degree, who received the title of Count of Zadunaisky. The great commander was A. V. Suvorov, who did not lose a single battle. He was an amazing old man who retained youthful mobility until the end of his life. At the age of 70, he inspired warriors by his personal example when crossing the mountains of the Alps. Suvorov also went down in history as a military leader who exclusively believed in soldiers, whom he called "miracle heroes." He also wrote a book - a guide for commanders - "The Science of Victory."
Admiral F.F. Ushakov covered himself with glory, especially with his Mediterranean campaign in 1798–1800. against the French fleet. He managed to take an almost impregnable naval fortress on about. Corfu. Ushakov began to apply new techniques sea battle that brought him success.
Catherine II generously rewarded her close associates, favorites, generals and other figures who served her. Money, jewelry flowed from the treasury like a wide river, high titles were given, honorary titles, large pensions. But especially characteristic was the unheard-of distribution of state lands with the peasants, especially in the newly acquired lands. For the suppression of the Polish uprising, Suvorov was granted an estate with 7 thousand (!) Souls of peasants, but there were gifts for 13 or more thousand people.
Along with enlightenment, secular dissent also came to the country (the former everything was entirely on religious grounds). European and North American science, culture, social Sciences. The example of the struggle for the independence of the future USA was also important.
Among the most famous enlightened freethinkers, N. I. Novikov and A. N. Radishchev should be noted. During the Great french revolution even opposition circles began to appear.
Catherine severely cracked down on dissidents, whom she considered "more dangerous than the Pugachev rebellion." He was imprisoned in the Novikov fortress, sent into exile Radishchev. From the beginning of the French Revolution, she took a hard line. The internal regime intensified, as the authorities were worried about the consequences of “freethinking”, which, in their opinion, had not been eradicated in time in France. Censorship was introduced, a lot of literature was banned.
French emigrants in Russia were forced to take an oath to the king, and suspicious ones were expelled. With France after the execution of the king, all relations were interrupted.
The reign of Paul I
Catherine did not love her only son Pavel, and he mutually hated his mother. In character, Pavel succeeded in his father and also loved everything German. He was an eccentric and despotic person, a petty tyrant by nature. Behind his signature came out both useful sensible orders and completely extravagant ones. Peter I was a tough-minded person, but not a madman. Paul was exactly the same. At the same time, the thought of the indisputability of the power of the monarch, that all the rest of his slaves, firmly settled in his head. He often humiliated the honor of the nobility, a concept already taking root in high society, did not take into account the rights of the nobility. In defiance of his mother, he pardoned and returned many of the repressed under her, but on the other hand he punished much more. Unreasonable and ridiculous orders in the army, the disgrace of many of the aristocracy, the constant fear of punishment, the tightening of police arbitrariness - all this caused discontent. I did not like the fact that the former cheerful court tone became gloomy. In the end, a conspiracy arose in favor of Paul's eldest son Alexander, and in 1801 the emperor was strangled.
With the coming to power of Paul, activity in relation to revolutionary France intensified even more. Russia entered into a coalition with Austria and other countries against France. Russian troops were sent to Italy and Switzerland, and the fleet to the Mediterranean. Later, for the successful conduct of the war, Suvorov was called from exile, who brilliantly ended his military leadership career with the Italian and Swiss campaigns. But for the benefit of Russia, these campaigns did not give anything.
Paul started the war with France because of a trifling reason, and then, offended by England, made peace with Napoleon and was going to attack the English colony of India. But death interrupted his plans.
1 Solovyov S. M. Public Readings on Russian History. M, 1992. S. 320.
Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation
federal state budgetary educational institution
higher professional education
Ulyanovsk State Technical University
Department of History and Culture
History abstract
Topic: "The role of the guard in the era of palace coups"
Completed by: Kochelaev A.S.
Group: PSbd–11
Checked by: Osipov S.V.
Ulyanovsk, 2013
1. Introduction
2. Causes and driving forces of palace coups
1) Causes of coups
2) Social causes of coups
3) Coup mechanism
3. Conclusion
4. List of used literature
Introduction
The era of palace coups is one of the most interesting pages in the history of the Russian state. The struggle of strong personalities, behind-the-scenes intrigues, high and low passions - everything can be found here.
When there is no law, the political question is usually decided by the ruling power. Such a force in the Russian palace coups of the last century was the privileged part of the regular army created by Peter, two guards regiments - Preobrazhensky and Semenovsky., To which two others were added during the reign of Anna - the infantry Izmailovsky and Horse Guards. The Guard took an active part in all difficulties; arising out of the question of succession to the throne, not a single change on the throne in 38 years was complete without the decisive intervention of the guards.
Causes and mechanism of palace coups
1. Causes of coups
In the XVIII century. a situation arose in which palace coups became the simplest, and sometimes the only way to resolve contradictions within the ruling circles. It would be logical to look for the reasons for the formation of these conditions in the activities and state transformations of Peter the Great, immediately preceding the era of palace coups.
Peter I the Great died on January 28, 1725, leaving no legitimate successors. He was too consistent and sober-minded ruler not to realize before his death what he was dooming Russia to. In agony, the emperor, trying to draw up a will, "took a pen, wrote a few words, but they could not be made out" 1 . “He himself noticed that he was not writing clearly, and therefore he shouted to call Princess Anna to him, whom he wanted to dictate. They run after her; she hurries to go, but when she comes to bed, he has already lost his language and consciousness, which never returned to him. 2 In such a situation, the enthronement of any sovereign can be regarded as a coup. Approximate "were only waiting for a minute when the monarch expires to get down to business" Peter was aware of the possibility of a dynastic crisis long before his death. The sovereign was married twice: to Evdokia Lopukhina (1692-1689) and Marta Skavronskaya, later Catherine I Alekseevna (1712-1725). From both marriages he had male children: Alexei Petrovich and Petr Petrovich. However, the father outlived both sons.
Alexey Petrovich had the greatest rights to the throne, being born in a marriage with a representative of a Russian aristocratic family. However, "the legitimate heir of Peter did not share it political views did not accept his reforms” 3 . After an unsuccessful attempt to escape abroad, Alexei Petrovich abdicated. He was sentenced to death, which, in accordance with the official version, did not have time to carry out, and the prince died a natural death.
Three years before the death of the prince, Ekaterina Alekseevna had a son, Peter. Although the child appeared when his parents were already married, the offspring of the Livonian "portomoi", the undivorced wife of a Swedish trumpeter 4 soldier, had less rights to the throne than his half-brother. But the child died at the age of three.
The male line of the Romanovs has not yet ceased. The same year of Peter Petrovich was the son of Tsarevich Alexei, Peter Alekseevich. But Peter I could not allow the accession to the throne of the son of the prince he had tortured and decided to take a radical step.
On February 5, 1822, the emperor issued the "Charter on the Succession to the Throne." The sovereign did not hide the main reason for the appearance of the "charter": the position of the heir, Tsarevich Alexei, threatened the existence of the Russian state. The content of the document is presented in a few final lines: "... It is always in the will of the ruling sovereign, whoever he wants, will determine the inheritance" 5
Thus, after the death of Peter I the Great traditional order inheritance in the direct male line came into conflict with the principles stated by the "Charter of Succession" of 1722. As a result, a dynastic crisis developed, which was resolved by the first palace coup. The same contradiction will cause other palace coups.
The reforms of Peter the Great created not only political, but also social conditions for palace coups. The upper social strata suffered. In the decree on single inheritance of 1714, the difference between the estates of boyars and nobles, between the legal status of an estate and an estate, was eliminated. The boyar class ceased to exist: "... all immovable things, that is, ancestral, served and purchased estates and estates ...". 6 As a result, the traditional confrontation between the boyar oligarchy and the noble service class was eliminated. The state could no longer use these contradictions, it was faced with a consolidated privileged class, which had to be reckoned with. This estate became the nobility. Of course, within the framework of the new estate, an upper layer quickly emerged, which can be conditionally called the noble aristocracy. Part of it was made up of people from the former boyars. However, they represented only one of the parties of the new socio-political elite, and after the defeat of the Dolgoruky and Golitsyn families, it practically ceased to exist.
The tendency to suppress the boyar opposition originated in the oprichnina of Ivan IV the Terrible. In the year of accession to the throne of Peter and Ivan Alekseevich, localism was finally abolished, the procedure for holding positions “according to the fatherland”, i.e. according to origin. The final stage falls on 1722, when the building of the Russian "regular state" was crowned with the publication of the "Table of Ranks".
As a result of the reforms of Peter the Great, the nobility became the only politically active estate. Palace coups and conspiracies that preceded them were prepared and carried out by the nobles. The nobles made up the parties, the nobles wove intrigues, the nobles were officers of the guards regiments and made up the majority of the guards themselves. The main contradictions in the nobility ran along the watershed between the local nobility and the noble aristocracy. The first saw the source of prosperity and social growth in the strong absolutist power of the emperor. The latter gravitated towards the establishment of a limited oligarchic monarchy.
2. The main driving force of palace coups
The main driving force behind the palace coups of the XVIII century. became a guard. The first guards regiments, Preobrazhensky and Semyonovsky, were transformed from the amusing regiments of the young Tsarevich Peter. The guard demonstrated its effectiveness already in the battle of Narva (1700), putting up stubborn resistance to the Swedish troops, while the rest of the Russian army fled in disarray. The guard became the core of the new army, the source of staff recruitment. The majority in the guards regiments were noblemen, the very ones who were now obliged to begin their service from the lower military ranks. The Guards were also entrusted with non-military tasks, for which qualified performers were required. “The guards conducted the first census, went abroad with responsible assignments, collected taxes, were appointed auditors and investigators, and sometimes a simple sergeant or officer was vested with greater powers than a governor or field marshal.” 7 A.D. Menshikov, Prince. Dolgoruky, V.N. Tatishchev, M.M. Golitsyn, B.K. Minich, the brothers Razumovsky and Shuvalov served in the guards regiments, or commanded them. The Guard became a special non-estate corporation, which was characterized by rare unity, discipline and an exaggerated idea of its role in court life. The guards were quartered in the capital, and, therefore, they were the force that could be quickly used as part of a palace coup. They were not just a toy in the hands of the parties, they themselves sought to realize their corporate interests. Serving at court, the guards were aware of all the events in government circles, reverence towards the authorities was alien to them.
Thus, during the reign of Peter the Great, elite paramilitary units were created, always located in close proximity to the center of political events.
By the end of the first quarter of the XVIII century. in Russia, a politically active consolidated class was formed - the nobility, the elite metropolitan paramilitary units - the guard, and a political oligarchy torn by contradictions. All these factors became, respectively, the social base, the driving forces and the organizational component of palace coups.
3. Mechanism of coups
Palace coups of the 18th century. had a significant number of similar features, which allows us to speak about a certain mechanism for their implementation.
An indispensable condition for a palace coup was political instability. At the head of the palace coup was always one or another political group. Court parties have always existed, however, the aggravation of the conflict between them and their rigid opposition to each other were usually clear signs of an approaching coup. In 1725, the "chicks of Petrov's nest" enthroned the sovereign's wife, thus defeating the aristocratic opposition. Extraordinary gain A.D. Menshikov under Catherine I marks the beginning of the period of temporary workers. The Golitsyn-Dolgoruky party takes revenge by deposing the “semi-power ruler” in 1727. When Anna Ioannovna came to the throne, the “supervisors”, putting forward conditions, entered into a confrontation with the rest of the noble mass, which was headed by S.A. Saltykov and A. M. Cherkassky. In the struggle against I. Biron in 1741, the party of A.I. Osterman. National-oriented parties of Elizabeth and Catherine II in 1741 and 1762 overthrew rulers associated with Russophobic politics. The paradox is that, unlike Peter III, there was not a drop of Russian blood in the veins of his wife. P.A. party conspiracy Palena in 1801, which objectively expressed the protest of society against the inconsistency of state policy, ended in regicide. The struggle of the court parties reflected the contradictions within the politically active public. Among them, firstly, one can note the struggle of aristocratic parties against groups of unborn nobles (coups of 1725, 1727, 1730). Secondly, we discover the confrontation between national parties and groupings, which, according to public opinion, pursued an anti-national policy (coups of 1740, 1741, 1762). Finally, one can single out the struggle of the noble parties for their privileges, which was most clearly manifested in the coup of 1801.
The palace coup was always preceded by a preparatory, conspiratorial stage. The conspiracy of the "Old Russian Party" 8 against A.D. Menshikov could only be drawn up during his protracted and dangerous illness. In 1730 D.M. Golitsyn and V.L. Dolgoruky in deep secrecy made up "conditions", and upon the arrival of Anna Ioannovna "gatherings of the guards began", "hundreds of landowners-nobles gathered in the houses of princes Trubetskoy, Baryatinsky and Cherkassky." Almost the same situation was repeated in 1741, when “the ruler took it into her head to explain herself to the opponent in private” 9 about the conspiracy being prepared by the latter. The deposition of Peter III in 1762 was clearly planned, and the preparations were carried out both in the guards and at the court, much attention was paid to the formation of public opinion. Vice-Chancellor N.P. Panin, St. Petersburg Governor-General P.A. Palen, the Zubov brothers (Catherine's favorites) and several commanders of the guards regiments - these are the main participants in the conspiracy of 1801.
For most palace coups, the main driving force was the guard. In 1725, according to one version: Prince Menshikov went with a company directly to the imperial palace, broke down the doors of the room where the senators and generals were, and declared Catherine the Empress and the legitimate Russian Empress. 1730, it was the guards who said the decisive word in favor of the autocracy of Anna Ioannovna. During the coups of 1741 and 1762. pretenders to the throne themselves led the rebellious guards regiments. The coup of 1801 was, in many respects, connected with the preference of the emperor for the "Gatchins" in comparison with guards regiments. Anna Ioannovna added Izmailovsky and Horse Guards to the two Peter's regiments, and Biron tried to reduce the percentage of nobles in the guards by recruiting commoners. However, neither these nor other measures could stop the arbitrariness of the guard, which continued to "make governments."
Usually the conspiracy matured at the top, among the noble aristocracy. The guard was an instrument of noble groups, an instrument for enthroning the desired figure. Housing in the capital, she was always "at hand". A significant part of the guards regiments were nobles, i.e. the guard was close to the conspirators in social relations. The guards were quite homogeneous, so the situation when one part fights against another was unthinkable for the 18th century. The guards regiment attracted to the side of the conspirators automatically determined the position of the entire guard (loyal or passive). And, finally, there was no alternative to the guards, since they were the most trained, prepared and disciplined military units, susceptible to agitation and having a long tradition and experience in carrying out armed coups.
During palace coups, the government side usually behaved extremely passively, giving all the initiative into the hands of the rebels. During the events of 1725, only the president of the Military Collegium, Prince. Repnin was indignant at the actions of the guards, who were taken out of the barracks without his order. In 1762 B.K. Minich tried to organize the resistance of the troops, including the Kronstadt garrison, and even mobilize the peasants, but Peter III himself behaved passively and pretty soon came to the new empress with an expression of humility.
In conditions of political instability, a conspiracy arose, which was implemented in the capital of one of the noble groups with the help of the guard. The success of the coup was largely due to the decisiveness of the actions of the rebels and the passivity of the opposite side. After the power phase of the coup, the stage of legitimization of power began. The fate of the defeated opponent was usually unenviable, and the cruelty in deciding his fate increased throughout the entire “era of palace coups”.
Ministry of Education and Science Russian Federation
Branch of NOU HPE "Moscow Institute of Entrepreneurship and Law" in Norilsk
Discipline: History of the Fatherland
Subject: Palace coups. The role of the guard. Expansion of the privileges of nobles.
Fulfilled by F.I.O. Cheban E.V.
Norilsk, 2012
Introduction
power struggle
Causes of palace coups
Conclusion
List of sources used
Introduction
According to most historians, the reasons for palace coups are as follows:
moving away from the national political tradition, according to which the throne passed only to the direct heirs of the tsar, Peter himself prepared a crisis of power (by not implementing the decree of 1722 on the succession to the throne, without appointing himself an heir);
a large number of direct and indirect heirs claimed the Russian throne after the death of Peter;
the existing corporate interests of the nobility and tribal nobility manifested themselves in their entirety.
Speaking about the era of palace coups, it should be emphasized that they were not state coups, that is, they pursued the goals of radical changes in political power and state structure(the events of 1730 were an exception)
When analyzing the era of palace coups, it is important to pay attention to the following points.
Firstly, the initiators of the coups were various palace groups that sought to elevate their protege to the throne.
Secondly, the most important consequence of the coups was the strengthening of the economic and political positions of the nobility.
Thirdly, the guards were the driving force behind the coups.
Indeed, the guard, a privileged part of the regular army created by Peter (these are the famous Semyonovsky and Preobrazhensky regiments, in the 30s two new ones, Izmailovsky and Horse Guards, were added to them) was a decisive force. Her participation decided the outcome of the case: on whose side the guard, that group won. The guard was not only a privileged part of the Russian army, it was a representative of the whole class (nobles), from whose midst it was almost exclusively formed and whose interests it represented.
In general, it would be most correct to assess the time of palace coups as a period of development of the noble empire from the formations of Peter the Great to a new major modernization of the country under Catherine 2. In the second quarter - the middle of the 18th century, there were no major reforms the reign of Elizabeth Petrovna is estimated as a period of counter-reforms).
1. Struggle for power
Dying, Peter did not leave an heir, having only time to write with a weakening hand: “Give everything ...”. The opinion of the leaders about his successor was divided. "Chicks of Petrov's Nest" (A.D. Menshikov, P.A. Tolstoy, I.I. Buturlin, P.I. Yaguzhinsky and others) spoke for his second wife Ekaterina, and representatives of the noble nobility (D.M. Golitsyn , V.V. Dolgoruky and others) defended the candidacy of their grandson - Peter Alekseevich. The outcome of the dispute was decided by the guards, who supported the empress.
The accession of Catherine 1 (1725-1727) led to a sharp strengthening of the position of Menshikov, who became the de facto ruler of the country. Attempts to somewhat curb his lust for power and greed with the help of the Supreme Privy Council (VTS) created under the Empress, to which the first three colleges, as well as the Senate, were subordinate, did not lead to anything. Moreover, the temporary worker decided to strengthen his position by marrying his daughter to Peter's young grandson. P. Tolstoy, who opposed this plan, ended up in prison.
In May 1727, Catherine I died and, according to her will, 12-year-old Peter II (1727-1730) became emperor under the regency of the military-technical cooperation. Menshikov's influence at court increased, and he even received the coveted rank of generalissimo.
But, pushing away old allies and not acquiring new ones among the noble nobility, he soon lost influence on the young emperor and in September 1727 was arrested and exiled with his whole family to Berezovo, where he soon died.
A significant role in discrediting the personality of Menshikov in the eyes of the young emperor was played by the Dolgoruky, as well as a member of the military-technical cooperation, the tutor of the tsar, nominated for this position by Menshikov himself - A.I. Osterman is a clever diplomat who, depending on the alignment of forces and the political situation, was able to change his views, allies and patrons. The overthrow of Menshikov was, in essence, an actual palace coup, because the composition of the military-technical cooperation has changed. In which aristocratic families began to prevail (Dolgoruky and Golitsyn), and A.I. began to play a key role. Osterman; the regency of the MTC was put an end to, Peter II declared himself a full-fledged ruler, who was surrounded by new favorites; a course was outlined aimed at revising the reforms of Peter I.
Soon the court left St. Petersburg and moved to Moscow, which attracted the emperor by the presence of richer hunting grounds. The sister of the tsar's favorite, Ekaterina Dolgorukaya, was betrothed to Peter II, but while preparing for the wedding, he died of smallpox. And again the question arose about the heir to the throne, because with the death of Peter II, the male line of the Romanovs was cut short, and he did not have time to appoint a successor.
In the conditions of a political crisis and timelessness, the military-technical cooperation, which by that time consisted of 8 people (5 seats belonged to the Dolgoruky and Golitsyns), decided to invite the niece of Peter I, the Duchess of Courland Anna Ioannovna, to the throne. It was also extremely important that she had no supporters and no connections in Russia.
As a result, this made it possible, beckoning with an invitation to the brilliant St. Petersburg throne, to impose their own conditions and get her consent to limit the power of the monarch.
The reign of Anna Ioannovna (1730-1740)
From the very beginning of her reign, Anna Ioannovna tried to erase even the memory of "conditions" from the consciousness of her subjects. She liquidated the military-technical cooperation, creating instead the Cabinet of Ministers headed by Osterman.
Gradually, Anna went to meet the most urgent requirements of the Russian nobility: their service life was limited to 25 years; that part of the Decree on Uniform Succession, which limited the right of the nobles to dispose of the estate when it was inherited, was canceled; easier to get an officer's rank. Not trusting the Russian nobility and not having the desire, and even the ability to delve into state affairs herself, Anna Ioannovna surrounded herself with people from the Baltic states. Key role at court passed into the hands of her favorite E. Biron.
Some historians call the period of Anna Ioannovna's reign "Bironism", believing that its main feature was the dominance of the Germans, who neglected the interests of the country, demonstrated contempt for everything Russian and pursued a policy of arbitrariness in relation to the Russian nobility. After the death of Anna Ioannovna in 1740, according to her will, the Russian throne was inherited by the great-grandson of Ivan Alekseevich, the son of Anna Leopoldovna and Anton Ulrich of Braunshveisky - Ivan Antonovich. Anna's favorite E.I. was appointed regent until he came of age. Biron, who was arrested less than a month later by the guards on the orders of Field Marshal B.K. Minikhin.
His mother, Anna Leopoldovna, was proclaimed regent for the royal child. The unsinkable A.I. began to play the leading role with her. Osterman, who survived five reigns and all temporary workers.
On November 1741, the tsar who never ruled was overthrown by Elizaveta Petrovna with the help of the guards. Taking advantage of the weakness of the government and her popularity, Elizabeth, the daughter of Peter I, dressed in a man's dress, appeared in the barracks of the Preobrazhensky Regiment with the words: "Guys, you know whose daughter I am, follow me. Do you swear to die for me?" - the future empress asked and, having received an affirmative answer, she led them to the Winter Palace. On the night of November 25, 1741, the grenadier company of the Preobrazhensky Regiment made a palace coup in favor of Elizabeth - the daughter of Peter I - (1741-1761)
Despite the similarity of this coup with similar palace coups in Russia in the 18th century. (apical character, strike force guard), he had a number distinctive features. The striking force of the coup on November 25 was not just the guards, but the lower guards - people from the taxable estates, expressing the patriotic sentiments of the broad sections of the capital's population. The coup had a pronounced anti-German, patriotic character. Wide sections of Russian society, condemning the favoritism of the German temporary workers, turned their sympathies towards Peter's daughter, the Russian heiress.
A feature of the palace coup on November 25 was the fact that the Franco-Swedish diplomacy tried to actively interfere in the internal affairs of Russia and, for offering help to Elizabeth in the struggle for the throne, to obtain from her certain political and territorial concessions, which meant a voluntary rejection of the conquests of Peter I.
Empress Elizaveta Petrovna reigned for twenty years, from 1741 to 1761. The most legitimate of all the successors of Peter I, raised to the throne with the help of the guards, she, as V.O. Klyuchevsky, "inherited the energy of her father, built palaces in twenty-four hours and traveled from Moscow to St. Petersburg in two days, peaceful and carefree, she took Berlin and defeated the first strategist of that time, Frederick the Great ... her courtyard turned into a theater foyer - everyone was talking about the French comedy, the Italian opera, but the doors would not close, the windows were blowing, the water flowed along the walls - such a “gilded poverty”.
The core of her policy was the expansion and strengthening of the rights and privileges of the nobility. The landowners now had the right to exile recalcitrant peasants to Siberia and dispose of not only land, but also the person and property of serfs. Under Elizabeth Petrovna, the Senate, the Chief Magistrate, and the Collegia were restored in their rights. In 1755 Moscow University was opened - the first in Russia.
An indicator of the increased influence of Russia on international life was its active participation in the all-European conflict of the second half of the 18th century. - in the Seven Years' War 1756 - 1763.
Russia entered the war in 1757. In the very first battle near the village of Gross-Egersdorf on August 19, 1757, Russian troops inflicted a serious defeat on the Prussian troops. At the beginning of 1758, Russian troops captured Koenigsberg. The population of East Prussia swore allegiance to the Empress of Russia - Elizabeth. The culmination of the military campaign of 1760 was the capture of Berlin on September 28 by the Russian army under the command of Chernyshov. (Frederick II was on the verge of death, but he was saved by a sharp turn in foreign policy Russia, caused by the accession to the throne of Peter III, who immediately broke off the military alliance with Austria, stopped hostilities against Prussia and even offered Frederick military assistance).
Elizabeth Petrovna's successor was her nephew Karl-Peter-Ulrich - Duke of Holstein - the son of Elizabeth Petrovna's older sister - Anna, and therefore on the mother's side - the grandson of Peter I. He ascended the throne under the name of Peter III (1761-1762) February 18, 1762 The Manifesto was published on the award of "liberty and freedom to the entire Russian noble nobility", i.e. for exemption from compulsory service. The "Manifesto", which removed the age-old duty from the class, was received with enthusiasm by the nobility.
Peter III issued Decrees on the abolition of the Secret Chancellery, on the permission to return to Russia to schismatics who had fled abroad with a prohibition to prosecute for a split. However, soon the policy of Peter III aroused discontent in society, restored the metropolitan society against him.
Particular dissatisfaction among the officers was caused by the refusal of Peter III from all conquests during the victorious Seven Years' War with Prussia (1755-1762), which was led by Elizaveta Petrovna. A conspiracy to overthrow Peter III matured in the guard.
As a result of the last palace coup in the 18th century, carried out on June 28, 1762, the wife of Peter III, who became Empress Catherine II (1762-1796), was elevated to the Russian throne. During the palace coup, Catherine was supported by influential representatives of the aristocracy: Count K. G. Razumovsky, educator of Paul I N. I. Panin, Prosecutor General I. A. Glebov, Princess E. R. Dashkova, and many guards officers. Catherine, like Peter, whom she idolized, surrounded herself devoted people. She generously rewarded her associates and favorites.
An attempt by Peter III to enter into negotiations did not lead to anything, and he was forced to personally sign the act of "spontaneous" oath abdication sent by Catherine.
Thus ended the era of "palace coups".
. Causes of palace coups
palace coup imperial throne
The general prerequisites for palace coups can be called:
Contradictions between various noble groups in relation to the Peter's heritage. It would be a simplification to consider that the split occurred along the lines of acceptance and rejection of reforms.
Both the so-called "new nobility", which came to the fore in the years of Peter the Great thanks to their service zeal, and the aristocratic party tried to soften the course of reforms, hoping in one form or another to give a respite to society, and first of all, to themselves.
But each of these groups defended its narrow class interests and privileges, which created a fertile ground for internal political struggle.
The sharp struggle of various groups for power, most often reduced to the nomination and support of one or another candidate for the throne.
active position guard, which Peter brought up as a privileged "support" of the autocracy, who, moreover, assumed the right to control the conformity of the personality and policy of the monarch to the legacy that her "beloved emperor" left.
The passivity of the masses, who are absolutely far from political life capital Cities.
Exacerbation of the problem of succession to the throne in connection with the adoption of the Decree of 1722, which broke the traditional mechanism for the transfer of power.
The spiritual atmosphere emerging as a result of the emancipation of the noble consciousness from traditional norms of behavior and morality, pushed for an active, often unprincipled political activity, inspired hope in good luck and "omnipotent chance", opening the way to power and wealth.
Conclusion
The stormy reform activity, which penetrated into all pores of economic, social, political, public and cultural life, with the death of Peter the Great, as it were, froze, taken by surprise. The sudden death of the head of the absolutist state paralyzed, first of all, the initiative of the supreme bodies of state government. The so-called era of palace coups began.
Indeed, from 1725 to 1762, eight coups took place in the country, each of which enthroned a new sovereign, after which, as a rule, there was a change in the personal composition of the ruling elite.
At the top of the reformer of the noble state erected by gigantic efforts, mouse fuss began in the form of a struggle for power by the hastily formed palace parties. It is not surprising that the main content of the internal policy of these years was the expansion and strengthening of the privileges of the nobility. This was sometimes done contrary to the decrees of Peter the Great, and the state reserves accumulated through his efforts were mediocrely squandered.
Palace coups did not entail changes in the political, and even more so social system society and were reduced to the struggle for power of various noble groups pursuing their own, most often selfish interests. At the same time, the specific policy of each of the six monarchs had its own characteristics, sometimes important for the country. In general, socio-economic stabilization and foreign policy successes achieved during the reign of Elizabeth created the conditions for accelerated development and new breakthroughs in foreign policy that would occur under Catherine II.
List of used literature
1.Orlov A.S., Polunov A.Yu., Shestova T.L., Shchetinov Yu.A. A manual on the history of the Fatherland for applicants to universities? electronic edition, 2005.
.Orlov A.S., Georgiev V.A., Georgieva N.G., Sivokhina T.A. History of Russia: textbook, 3rd ed.? M .: Prospekt, 2008.
.Vernadsky G.V. Russian history: [Textbook] - M .: Agrad, 2001.
.History of Russia, the end of the XVII-XIX century: a textbook for 10 cells. / IN AND. Buganov, P.N. Zyryanov; ed. A.N. Sakharov. - 11th ed. - M.: Enlightenment, 2005. - 304 p.
Tutoring
Need help learning a topic?
Our experts will advise or provide tutoring services on topics of interest to you.
Submit an application indicating the topic right now to find out about the possibility of obtaining a consultation.
Palace coups - a change of power as a result of the struggle of groups within the ruling class while relying on the army (its privileged part). In modern usage - "silent" change of power.
The period (epoch) of palace coups in national history it is customary to call 1725 - 1762, when in Russian Empire the supreme power passed from hand to hand mainly through coups, which were carried out by noble groups with the support and assistance of the guard. During 1725 - 1761. There were six monarchs on the Russian throne. In accordance with classical historiography, “the era of palace coups is the period of 1725-1762, when the change of power in the Russian Empire took place mainly through palace coups carried out by noble groups with the assistance of guards regiments. In 1725 A.D. Menshikov enthroned Catherine I; in 1727, the Dolgorukovs obtained Menshikov's exile from Peter II; in 1740, the guard overthrew E.I. Biron; in 1741, Elizaveta Petrovna overthrew the infant emperor Ivan VI Antonovich, in 1762 Catherine II overthrew her husband Peter III. ”Thus, there are 5 palace coups in the period from the death of Peter I to the accession of Catherine II.
Background and features of palace coups. In the second quarter of the 18th century, a period began in the history of Russia, which, according to the figurative expression of the historian V.O. Klyuchevsky, the name of the "epoch of palace coups". During this period, the struggle of court factions for power began, which was facilitated by the fact that after the death of Emperor Peter I in January 1725, there were no direct male heirs to the Russian throne.
In accordance with the law on succession to the throne, caused by the case of Tsarevich Alexei Petrovich, the emperor himself had to appoint a successor to himself, but did not have time. The struggle for the throne between noble groups brought to power mainly women from the royal family, or children.
Their change was in the nature of palace coups. This was explained by the narrowly selfish interests mainly of two noble groups: titled, but not well-born nobility (A.D. Menshikov, P. Tolstoy, G.I. Golovkin, F.M. Apraksin, P.I. Yaguzhinsky, I.I. Buturlin ), who owed their elevation to Peter I and the "Table of Ranks" and the well-born hereditary nobility (D.M. Golitsyn, Dolgorukov, N.V. Repnin), who believed that governing was their primordial right. Between them there was a struggle for power and the new advantages and privileges associated with it.
At that time, the guards began to play an active role in the political life of the country, which Peter brought up as a privileged "support" of the autocracy, which, moreover, assumed the right to control the compliance of the personality and policy of the monarch with the legacy that her emperor left.
The alienation of the masses from politics and their passivity served as fertile ground for palace intrigues and coups.