Nosovsky and Fomenko tartaria are just facts. Technogenic gods, tartaria and the merger of parts of the world
In 1782, the most famous monument Petru - famous " Bronze Horseman» Etienne Falcone
PHOTO: wikipedia.orgPeter Romanov inherited the Russian throne at the age of 10, in 1682, and began to rule Russia seven years later. The young tsar was the first of the Russian monarchs to make a thorough trip to Western Europe, and after returning from a foreign land, he began to reshape Russia in a European way, so on a large scale, quickly and urgently that he became known as a grandiose reformer, and even expanded the territory of the empire in the Baltic region and strengthened his authority Russian state in the world. Therefore, Peter the Great was nicknamed the Great.
The beginning, it would seem, did not promise dizzying career to this person. He was born the fourteenth child of Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich, but was the first-born of his mother, Tsarina Natalya Naryshkina. The one-year-old Peter was given up for nannies, and his education at the time of succession to the throne was weak, he even wrote later all his life with errors. But the boy was unusually inquisitive and a lot of science, both in childhood and in adulthood, successfully comprehended in practice. An indicative story is how Tsar Peter, in simple clothes, on a par with the peasants, planed and sawed at foreign shipyards, learning ship craft.
In the likeness of foreign systems, Peter made of Russian Empire police regular state, divided it into provinces; he dressed the shaved gentlemen in foreign clothes, changed the calendar, founded the first Russian newspaper, and in 1724 founded the Academy of Sciences. Even the progressive emperor ordered the laying of new cities, but not like those familiar to the expanse of Mother Russia, chaotic and variegated, but according to civilized laws - pre-planned, topographically verified, adapted for communications and roads. The sovereign "run in" the project in the southern seaside Taganrog, he was going to arrange the capital there, but the war with the Turks there corrected the plans. After the first fitting, in the likeness of Taganrog urban planning, Peter the Great erected his glorious brainchild - St. Petersburg.
And what other cities arose in our country thanks to this emperor? Peter laid the royal hand on several settlements, sometimes noble, but did not become cities. "Evening Moscow" found information about the creations of the Petrovs, who received the status of cities in ancient times or in modern history. Let's arrange them in chronological order.
1. Petrovsk, Saratov region
A successful campaign against Azov inspired the young tsar to build a fortress on the Medveditsa River, a tributary of the Don Batyushka in the Saratov region. It was necessary to protect the territory from raids. Crimean Tatars and roaming robbers. The sovereign issued a corresponding decree on November 15, 1697. And six months later, a quadrangular fortress was laid there. Merchants and handicrafts began to develop there, a whole Petrovsky district was formed. Now it is the administrative center of the Petrovsky district of the Saratov region with a population of approximately 30 and a half thousand inhabitants. And the main attractions of the townspeople consider the monument to Peter the Great on the forecourt, created by the sculptor A. Drozdov, the century-old church in the name of the icon of the Kazan Mother of God and the Church of the Intercession of the Holy Mother of God.
2. Taganrog, Rostov region
In the story about this city, an incredible number of uses of the word "for the first time." Taganrog was founded in 1698 by Peter the Great and became the first Russian naval base, the first Russian port on the open sea coast, the first city in Russia built according to a regular plan, the Taganrog harbor is the first in the world built not in a natural bay, but in the open sea , this is the first city of the Russian Empire, where a commercial court was introduced in 1808, it was the only non-capital city with an Italian opera, and in 1699 the first penal servitude in the history of Russia was established in the region, and Taganrog became its center. The city is located on the Miussky Peninsula of the Taganrog Bay of the Sea of Azov, the historical part - on Cape Taganiy Rog with a lighthouse. In fact, this is a rather large city-peninsula, except for one direction, wherever you go - you will go to the sea. Once upon a time, nobles, officials and clergy were exiled there, as well as captured Turks and Tatars, Swedes and Balts. Greek, Italian merchants, Armenian, Jewish merchants and the nobility poured there by sea. So the national flavor of the population of about 300,000 current residents is unique. In Taganrog, researchers identified Pushkin's Lukomorye; many world-famous celebrities were born or lived there, from emperors and military leaders to writers, composers, and artists. During the Great Patriotic War in the three-year occupation, the most powerful anti-fascist underground of the South operated there; on November 3, 2011, Taganrog was awarded honorary title"City of Military Glory".
3. Kamensk-Uralsky, Sverdlovsk region
The city was founded in 1701 by the Decree of Emperor Peter the Great and for the first two centuries was known for the Kamensky state-owned iron foundry, which produced the best cannons in the world. Ore in those places lay at the very surface and was easily mined by hand. This was noticed by the servants of the Dalmatov Monastery and legally registered the land for themselves. But soon Tsar Peter realized the easy availability of ore, which was so necessary for the state, his specialists highly appreciated the Ural ore, the emperor returned the state land to the treasury and issued a decree on the construction of an ironworks there, the foundation of the future city. In January 1774, the Kamensky plant participated in the peasant uprising of Emelyan Pugachev. The workers got out of the control of the breeders and cast ten cannons and three hundred pounds of cannonballs for the Pugachevites. The tsarist regiment defeated a detachment of rebels and returned the plant to the state. During the Great Patriotic War, the only aluminum plant in the country worked in Kamensk-Uralsky, thanks to which Soviet aviation existed. The city is notable for the fact that the border of the Urals and Siberia passes through it. Today, the city's population is over 172,000, mostly Russians and Tatars.
4. Lodeynoye field, Leningrad region
In 1702 it arose as a settlement of shipbuilders at the Olonets shipyard founded by Peter the Great. The choice of location is understandable - three-quarters of the entire area is covered with forests in Lodeynoye Pole; for a long time, the inhabitants of small settlements have been logging there, and there was also shipbuilding. Over the 130 years of operation of the Olonets shipyard, about 450 ships have been assembled. They built it quickly then - the Northern War with Sweden urged on. And near the shipyard there were forges, workshops, residential barracks, and the town was formed. There was also a temporary house of Tsar Peter. The settlement grew and in 1785 Catherine the Second ordered to give it the status of a city. During the Great Patriotic War, Lodeynoye Pole kept the defense for 1000 days, preventing the Nazis from approaching Leningrad, guarding the Road of Life. Now it is the administrative center of the Lodeynopolsky district Leningrad region with a population of 20 and a half thousand people.
5. St. Petersburg
The grandiose, most famous creation of Peter the Great. Until January 26, 1924 - Petrograd, until September 6, 1991 - Leningrad. He was named emperor in honor of the Apostle Peter, the keeper of the keys to the gates of paradise. The metropolis is located on the coast of the Gulf of Finland and at the mouth of the Neva River. Petersburg was the capital of Russia for two centuries, beginning in 1710. It was founded in 1703, when the first stone was laid on Hare Island, and began to grow. new town; First there was the Peter and Paul Fortress. It was erected by the forces of serfs, forcibly driven to the building, several thousand people died from malnutrition and overwork. In 1710, by royal decree, 15,000 different craftsmen from all over the country were resettled there, and land in the city was distributed to them for nothing. That's why central part cities formed very quickly. The city was built by foreign experts according to European canons both in architecture and in infrastructure - according to a clear layout. That's just about the decoration of the city until the middle of the 18th century, almost did not care. But Empress Elizabeth introduced new landmark- majestic buildings worthy of the capital. And under Paul the First, the most mystical building in St. Petersburg was built - the Mikhailovsky Castle, densely overgrown with legends. In the 20th century, they came to grips with the comfort of St. Petersburg: dozens of bridges were erected, railway lines were built, and a tram was launched. And then the Russians poured in there in a stream, the population grew faster than New York. The most tragic period of the city - the blockade of Leningrad, 900 heroic days in 1941-1945. Now the population of the city is more than 5 million inhabitants, it is the 4th largest city in Europe. St. Petersburg is notable for the fact that the total length of all watercourses on its territory is 282 km, their water surface- about 7% of the total area of the city.
6. Petrozavodsk, the capital of Karelia
In 1703, on the shores of Lake Onega near the mouth of the Lososinka River, by decree of Tsar Peter, the Shuisky ironworks and cannon foundry were built. And the ore for it was taken in the lake itself. For the monarch, a two-story wooden palace and a field church were built there. Then a copper-smelting and metalworking plant was opened. Of course, a settlement has grown up around such a large production. In 1920, Soviet Petrozavodsk became the capital of the Karelian Labor Commune, and soon the capital of the Karelian Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic. In October 1941, the city was occupied by Finnish troops, renamed it Jaanislinna, at which time seven concentration camps. A system of rivers and canals connects Petrozavodsk with the Baltic, White, Barents, Caspian and Black Seas, the city also has five lakes. The current population of Petrozavodsk is 270,600 inhabitants, mostly Russians. But the city is also a place of compact residence of Karelians (20% of the Karelians of the republic) and Vepsians (more than half of all Vepsians of Karelia and a quarter of all Vepsians of Russia).
7. Lipetsk, regional center
In ancient times, there was a village called Malye Studenki Lipetskiye. And in 1703, Tsar Peter looked after this place at the confluence of the Lipovka River into the Voronezh River to locate iron and steel plants, so that they would produce products for Russian army and fleet. And factory workers were placed with the villagers, calling the settlement Lipsky Iron Factories. In 1779, it became a county town of the Tambov viceroy, and then Lipetsk. There would be no happiness, but misfortune helped - in 1806 a strong fire destroyed part of the city, and instead of chaotically set up barracks and houses, new buildings were erected according to master plan- with wide straight streets between mansions. And even a complex of resort buildings appeared. Lipetsk became a regional Soviet center in 1954. It is located on the banks of the Voronezh River (Don basin), at an altitude of about 160 meters above sea level. Now it is a dynamically developing city of the Chernozem region - over the past 50 years, its population has quadrupled, exceeding 500,000.
8. Biysk, Altai Territory
The history of Biysk began in 1709 with the Bikatun prison, one of the defensive structures of the southeastern borders of Russia against raids from the Dzungar Khanate. Just a year later, the Teleuts destroyed it. A new prison was erected nearby, on the Biya River, so the prison had to be renamed Biysky. The relevance of the fortress disappeared and in 1846 the city was transformed from a military-administrative into a commercial and industrial one, a tannery, a distillery, brick and sawmills, a shag and linen factories, a steam mill, and a refrigerator were built there. Biysk is famous for being the center of the Altai Spiritual Mission, which in 1830-1840 gave rise to one of the first scientific translations of the Bible from Hebrew and Greek into Russian in Russia. Now 205,250 people live in Biysk. This is a city of research and production enterprises of the defense industry. The Institute of Problems of Chemical and Energy Technologies of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences is located in Biysk. On November 21, 2005, the city was given the status of a science city of the Russian Federation.
9. Peterhof (Petrodvorets), Leningrad region
This country residence Russian emperors founded by Peter the Great in 1710 on the southern coast of the Gulf of Finland near St. Petersburg. The grandiose system of fountains of Peterhof is famous all over the world. And once there were three small Finnish villages. But by 1714, the Great Peterhof Palace, the Great Grotto with cascades, Monplaisir and other structures of the Lower Park were laid on the ground. At first, the settlement at the Palace was built up chaotically, most of the peasants lived in dugouts at all. In the 1730s, the famous architect M. Zemtsov created a clear layout for Peterhof. The world-famous hydraulic system of Peterhof was created 10 years earlier according to the project of hydraulic engineer Vasily Tuvolkov. To supply the fountains, a water conduit 40 km long was built, along its length there are 18 storage ponds with almost one and a half million cubic meters of water. The water cannons that gained popularity worked on the principle of communicating vessels. In the mid-1850s, businessman A. Stieglitz financed the construction of the Peterhof railway 30 km to Petersburg. Peterhof became the city in 1762, a wonderful landmark of which to this day is a monument of world architecture and palace and park art, the Peterhof Museum-Reserve. In 1944, the city was renamed Petrodvorets, the science city of the Russian Federation since 2005, the population is over 73,000.
10. Sestroretsk, Leningrad region
In 1721, the sovereign decided to build another weapons factory and remembered the place where in 1703 Russian troops defeated the Swedish army in order to break through at least one outlet for Russia to the Baltic Sea. It was near the Sestra River, and the harbor remained there. And Peter ordered to build nearby, on the shores of the Gulf of Finland, a summer palace with a garden. The desire of the sovereign was embodied by 1724 from locally produced bricks (however, in 1781 the palace was dismantled). Well, not far away they began to build a plant. For a long time he then provided the Russian warriors with gunpowder, pistols, muskets and cannons. From the peaceful assortment, his handles for doors, copper buttons and lattices for the Fontanka River of the Catherine Canal are memorable. In 1735, the Chernorechensky iron foundry was built on Dibuna-bolot to help the Sestroretsk plant, things went even better. Sestroretsk craftsmen became famous for making the famous "Papin's car" based on the drawings of M. Lomonosov. And since 1922, the Soviet Sestroretsk plant was converted into a tool plant. In the 1960s-1980s, the city was massively built up with multi-storey buildings and a mud bath was opened there. The city has become a seaside climatic balneo-mud resort with its own mineral water and therapeutic mud. Several streams now flow through Sestroretsk, connecting Lake Sestroretsky Razliv and the Gulf of Finland. local residents about 37,250 people are registered there.
(continuation)
The urban estate, which consisted in the XVII century. from trading people (merchants) and townspeople (urban taxable inhabitants), it was closed only in the middle of the 17th century. and was negligible in numbers and industrial activity. Peter, on the other hand, saw in the urban commercial and industrial class, following the example of Western mercantilists, the main factor in national wealth. It is clear what efforts he had to make in order to raise the urban class to the desired degree of development. We will see his measures for the rise of Russian industry and trade in its proper place; in the eyes of Peter I, the correct organization of the urban class, which would allow the cities to succeed in trade and industry, should have led to such a rise. Back in 1699, he gave the cities self-government, but the Chambers of Burmister did not create any organization for the class that elected them. This organization of the city was achieved only at the end of the reign of Peter.
Guided by Western European forms of urban organization, Peter I at the beginning of 1720 established the Chief Magistrate in St. Petersburg, to whom he instructed to be in charge of the urban estate everywhere, and gave the Magistrate the following year a regulation that set out the foundations of the urban structure. Cities were divided according to the number of inhabitants into 5 classes; citizens of each city - into two main classes: citizens regular and irregular.
Regular citizens were divided into two guilds: bankers, merchants, doctors and pharmacists, skippers, painters and jewelers, artists and scientists belonged to the first guild. The second guild was made up of petty traders and artisans, united in workshops.
Irregular citizens were "vile", that is, people of low origin (laborers, hirelings, day laborers).
Persons of other classes (clergy, nobles, peasants), permanently living in the city, were not included in the number of citizens, only "listed in citizenship" and did not participate in city self-government.
The city was governed by an elected board - a magistrate. She was elected from her midst only by regular citizens. The vile people elected their elders, who represented their interests in the magistrate. The magistrate, subordinate to the Chief Magistrate, was in charge of the economy of the city, looked after the order. Its main goal was the development of trade and crafts; he had great power in his hands. Under the jurisdiction of the magistrate there was a shop management: at the head of each craft shop was a foreman (alderman), chosen from the masters; in his hands was the management of shop affairs. For the title of a master craftsman, one had to pass an exam; without an exam it was impossible to open any production.
Street traffic on the Voskresensky bridge (Moscow) in the 18th century. Artist A. Vasnetsov
Having given the urban estate a harmonious organization, Peter I not only left him all the old benefits that the townspeople used before him, but also gave them new ones. Regular citizens, although they retained the character of a taxable estate, were spared from compulsory recruitment duty; in 1722, Peter removed from the townspeople the personal service for state needs, which the townspeople were burdened with before Peter; finally, the townspeople received the right to own serfs and land on an equal footing with the nobility, if they were manufacturers or breeders. Thus, Peter I created a rather privileged position for the urban class. He introduced a completely new organization into urban life. But here, too, only the forms were new; the favorable attitude of the government towards the townspeople was also noticeable in the 17th century, especially in its second half.
So, a review of estate reforms shows us that Peter I changed a lot in estate life and relations. The gentry began to serve more correctly and received better support for their service; the peasantry merged with servility into one taxable category and, without losing their civil personality, became under the personal power of the landowner; citizens received an organization, the right to self-government and some privileges. External forms of social relations have changed a lot; but in essence social order stayed old; the state retained its agricultural and military character, the nobility retained its high administrative and economic position, the peasants still belonged to the state through the landowner, and the urban estate still belonged to far from the main role in the development of the national economy.
1. Select and sign the portrait of Peter the Great.
2. Seryozha and Nadia's dad offers you a task. Choose the correct answers and mark them with a "+" sign.
Peter the Great was proclaimed tsar:
Peter the Great opened the first museum. He called:
The city founded by Peter the Great - St. Petersburg became:
The regiments recruited by decree of young Peter were called:
3. Find 2 mistakes in the text and underline them.
For 13 years there was a war with the Swedes. At that time, a resident of Tver, Matvey Kolymagin, decided to pay a visit to St. Petersburg on his trading business. News about life in the new capital was published in the newspaper, which reached his native Tver. Now he saw with his own eyes the Peter and Paul Fortress and Faceted Chamber . Not far from the Summer Palace of Tsar Peter, the merchant met his countryman Agafon Nikiforov. Rejoiced, the friend invited him to his house to celebrate the New Year, which, by decree of the king, was celebrated September 1 .
4. Read an extract from a letter written in 1712 from the English ambassador in Berlin. Who is the author of the letter talking about? What do you find unusual about this person's behavior? Why do you think he did this?
The king was to dine with the queen tonight, and great preparations were made for a ball in his honor, but her majesty and the whole society were disappointed by the apology sent by the king at about six o'clock. The king met a Dutch miller, whom he met on his first trip, the owner of a windmill and a small house with a garden ... the sovereign ate and stayed with him for quite a long time.
Briefly write down your answers to the questions.
5. Read an excerpt from the work of A. S. Pushkin. Write down what it is about.
And he thought:
From here we will threaten the Swede,
Here the city will be founded To spite the arrogant neighbor.
Here we are destined by nature to cut a window into Europe,
Stand with a firm foot by the sea.
Here on their new waves All the flags will visit us,
And let's hang out in the open.
An excerpt about the construction of St. Petersburg, about the fact that Russia received access to the Baltic Sea.
6. On contour map using the textbook map (pp. 92-93):
1) paint with different colors:
a) the territory of Russia by the end of the 17th century (shaded in green)
;
b) territories that became part of the Russian Empire in the 18th century (shaded in yellow)
;
2) circle with a colored pencil the cities that appeared under Peter the Great; underline the new capital of Russia (underlined in red line - St. Petersburg) .
7. Circle on the "timeline" the year when Russia became an empire.
Recently, a lot of facts have begun to emerge that indicate that the history of our earthly civilization is distorted much more than Nosovsky and Fomenko write about it in their works. Their technique is that they question the dates, the names of historical characters and the names of certain objects that different peoples really could be called differently, but at the same time they do not call into question the events themselves described in a particular document. Since a certain event is described, it means, Nosovsky and Fomenko believe, it really happened, you just need to correctly determine the date and place of this event, as well as those people who are actually talking about in one way or another. At the same time, we must give them their due, they have done a gigantic job of analyzing and systematizing a very large amount of information, various documents and facts. And still, a lot of questions remain about the version that they formed. Including because it explains far from all the facts that we observe.
For example, their theory does not in any way observe the paradoxes that are observed in St. Petersburg, as well as many other cities where construction technologies were clearly used, which at that time, according to both versions, could not exist, and some of these technologies we now even we don't know. The “New Chronology” does not explain the backfilling of buildings and structures observed everywhere, which many authors write about, including myself in the fifth part.
During the discussion of the previous fragments, readers sent a link to a very interesting map of the world in 1575, which was drawn by the Frenchman Francois De Belleforest. If you carefully look at this map, you will find a lot of interesting things that do not fit into either the official history or the New Chronology.
I managed to find this map in a sufficiently high resolution, which, unfortunately, is not possible for all the old maps to which I was sent links. The full-size version, on which all signatures are perfectly readable, opens at the link with the image.
What is interesting on this map is that the largest or most important cities are depicted and signed. At the same time, many cities are depicted in Africa. We can also observe rivers there that do not exist on today's map.
While working on a series of articles about Tartaria, I looked through a lot of old maps, and all of them have one feature. On them, the authors can completely incorrectly depict the shape and position of rivers, lakes and seas, islands and continents, but at the same time, the topology of objects, that is, their relationships, is almost always correctly depicted. There are practically no mistakes as to which river the main cities stand on, which river flows into which other river, lake or sea, which seas are connected by straits with which other seas or oceans. This is explained quite simply. They still didn’t know how to accurately measure distances and fix the shape of objects, but here are the straits through which you can swim to certain countries, or which rivers you need to swim in order to get to this or that city, it was very well known from many travelers and merchants.
In addition, a similar configuration of rivers in North Africa, where the Sahara desert should actually be, is also observed on other maps until the first half of the 18th century. And only after this moment in this place they begin to designate the "Grand Desert Sahara", that is, the great Sahara Desert. It turns out that in the middle of the 16th century there was no Sahara in Africa?
It is also interesting that if the names of cities in Europe, the Middle East, the territory of India and northern Africa more or less correspond to what we know, then in the same Siberia or on the territory of present-day China there is nothing even close! Moreover, there are surprisingly many cities in Siberia, including those clearly beyond the Arctic Circle: Taingim, Naiman, Turfon, Coβin, Calami, Obea. Do these names mean anything to you?
It is also not clear what is happening with the territory of modern China. The names of most cities are clearly not Chinese. And where did Beijing (Běijīng) go?! But it is believed that it is believed that Beijing was the largest city in the world in the periods from 1425 to 1650 and from 1710 to 1825. But we see on the map in this place a lot of cities, but not the most Big City planets. Or the Chinese have not yet been resettled to our Earth, and this happened after 1575?
During the discussion of this map, it was suggested that the author could not draw non-existent cities "to make it beautiful." But if you look at the same North America, then the author will not invent anything there. There are no cities, so we don’t depict anything. And in Europe, he did not come up with anything. Although, there are oddities. It is very interesting which cities for the author seemed significant in Europe and on the territory of Russia. In Europe, Lisbona (Lisbon), Sevilla, Lion, Brest, Paris, Ausburg, Wien, Danzic, Cracow, Buda, Ragura(?), Bergen are marked, plus Constantinople is clearly not quite legible. But a little to the right and below it we see Troy (Troia)!!! That is, in the second half of the 16th century, its location was not only perfectly known, but the city itself still existed. And the official version of history claims that Troy disappeared before our era. By the way, where is Rome? Or was there not enough space on the Iberian Peninsula for a badge and an inscription?
But can the merging of the realities of different Earths explain that in different "parts of the world" continents and cities were located at different points or were absent altogether?
Moscow, Vyshegrad, Novgorod, Solovki (!!!), and a certain S. Nicolas - St. Nicholas (?) are marked on the territory of Russia.
Let's just say, not a lot. Or is it only the administrative centers of the territories? If so, then what is the population density in North Africa and Siberia, if there are so many administrative centers?
It is also interesting which European states, according to the author, were worthy of being displayed on the map: England, Spain, Gaul, Germany, Greece, Italy, Russia, Sweden and Norway. Yeah, not a lot. Tartaria, by the way, is marked, although the border is shown in such a way that almost all of the lower and middle Volga gets there. And the total area, which the author attributed to Tartaria, is relatively small.
At the same time, it is interesting that France itself, according to the author of the map, who is supposedly French, is called Gaul, as in the days of the Roman Empire. But Rome is missing. Well, with everything else, for example, the author could lie, but what is the name of his country, which, according to the official myth, by the time of the reign of Louis XI (1461-1483) actually ended feudal fragmentation and turned into an absolute monarchy, he should have known? At the same time, it cannot be said that this map was made by a complete ignoramus, since many things are displayed and indicated quite correctly. And it seems to me that this Frenchman (or Gallician?) can be trusted more than the official historical myth. And if so, then in 1575 the catastrophe that led to the formation of the Sahara Desert had not yet occurred. There are still cities and rivers that disappeared after the catastrophe.
But, let's put the old maps aside, because the more you study them, the more questions appear, so we'll return to this topic a little later, outside the cycle of articles about the death of Tartaria.
After the publication of references to the Apocalypse, I received one very interesting comment:
“About the destroyed circulations
just in case - I'm not a religious person, for me the bible is not an object of worship, but a monument of history and culture.
Grandmother said that as a child she heard an alternative version of the Apocalypse, which was read to her from some old bible. what she remembered and what I remembered in her retelling)
"and the Earth will be entangled in a steel web, and steel birds will fly across the sky ... all the ravines and gullies will be plowed up, but they will not eat their fill." well, according to that "Apocalypse" all this will be already in end times, after which everything will be very bad.
I tried to investigate this issue and found out that many people mention a similar text (in retelling) (geography - from Arkhangelsk to the Urals), which is an argument for me - they obviously did not know my grandmother, which means that such a source objectively existed somewhere . By the way, in memory last time I saw the book itself with my relative and leafed through a teenager in the 50s of the last century.
in total - there was some alternative version of the Bible, it was published in a large circulation - it seems that it was in almost every village, once and in a hundred years the descendants of the inhabitants of those villages remember it. it is logical to assume that the information reached at least some form due to the mass nature of the source. Well, I remembered thanks to many coincidences of predictions with the realities of the new time.
I would be much more comfortable knowing that some library holds a surviving copy of that bible. but something tells me that where it is easy to find nothing anymore. http://mylnikovdm.livejournal.com/6658.html?thread=407810#t407810
Another interesting comment on kramola.info:
“The landing party... The landing party killed me... How many landing troops do you need to cover such a territory? 1.5 million sq. km of just affected lands, another 7 million sq. km of the immediate environs, not to mention the distant ones. Millions of pieces of equipment? Carrying individually protected, armed biological objects, because we are talking about a total cleansing. On the other hand, it is not simultaneous everywhere... It is hard to imagine the resources that were transferred to the planet and involved in such a mission, they are so quantitatively and energy intensive. The end must justify the means. And secondly - where is the beneficiary? In whose interests was all this done? Hmm..."
In this particular place, I personally do not see any serious problems, since the Apocalypse literally says the following:
"5. And given to her do not kill them, but only torture them for five months; and her torment is like the torment of a scorpion, when sting a person.
(Revelation of John the Theologian 9:5)"
In terms of impact, this is more like the use of some kind of chemical or bacteriological weapon, which was sprayed from the air. And given the time of five months, this could be done with a relatively small number of devices.
But the next fragment, which was also pointed out by some readers, to be honest, still baffles me.
"fifteen. And four angels were released, prepared for an hour and a day, and a month and a year, in order to kill a third of the people.
16. The number of cavalry troops was two darkness; and I heard the number of it.
(Revelation of John the Theologian 9:15,16)"
The old Russian numeral "darkness" means ten thousand. Based on this, in this fragment we are talking about the number of troops in 200 million units. That's way too big even for today. And even more so for older times. To bring such a number of troops through space is also not very simple task. Unless a small planetoid like the Moon was used instead of a ship, but this means a colossal expenditure of energy. But then, as it was rightly noted in the comments, why such costs? What then is the real purpose of the invaders. That is, there is either a clear exaggeration of the narrator, or we do not quite understand something about what is happening.
And finally, the answer to the last comment before I go to the finish line.
Several people have already expressed themselves in this spirit: “Listen, apart from old European maps, is there at least one proof of the existence of Tartaria?”
In fact, it doesn’t really matter to me personally what the name of this state, destroyed at the beginning of the 19th century, was called, Tartaria or something else. But according to the facts that have already been collected in quantity, I see that in the 18th century the Romanov-Oldenburg dynasty, with the support of the European ruling dynasties, began to seize the territories of the Orthodox state. And this capture began with the establishment of control over St. Petersburg. An attempt was made to capture Moscow in 1773-1775, which we know as "the uprising of the peasants led by Emelyan Pugachev" but it ended unsuccessfully, although the official Romanov version of history today assures us of the opposite. That is why the second war of 1810-1815 was required, for which the Romanovs-Oldenburgs carefully prepared for many years, including building many canals and building three river systems for the passage of ships in order to provide themselves with the logistics of offensive military operations against Moscow and other cities not yet captured. In 1812, Smolensk and Moscow were captured, in 1815 Kazan. These are the cities for which I have already checked the facts.
And in April 1815, a large-scale planetary catastrophe occurs in Western Siberia, organized by the “masters”, who are faithfully served by the Western ruling elite. This catastrophe destroyed those people who lived in this territory at that time. Approximately in the same years, in the region of 1810-1815, the cleaning of the Ural Mountains was also carried out using nuclear weapons. All this together leads to the fact that the Romanovs-Oldeburgs get the opportunity to quickly annex these territories to their newly formed Empire with minimal losses. The economic, transport and military infrastructure that existed on the territory of Western Siberia was largely destroyed, great amount people died, the rest are disorganized and are on the verge of survival. That is, there is simply no one physically to offer large-scale resistance to the new authorities. By the way, I do not rule out that the old state could also be called the Russian Empire, and the Romanovs-Oldenburgs simply got their hands on this name to make it easier to falsify documents.
Somewhere in the 20-30s of the 19th century, the process of replacing true Orthodoxy with its surrogate began, which partially uses the external paraphernalia of Orthodoxy, but in its essence and ideology is Judeo-Christianity, a religion for slaves. This explains the fact that already published editions of the New Testament and the Psalter are destroyed, and the distribution of their old versions is prohibited. Instead, a new, thoroughly corrected version is issued, which today is known as the "Synodal Translation".
It is also interesting that the Metropolitan of Moscow and Kolomna Filaret was in charge of the translation. And according to the official historical myth, the first serious reform of Orthodoxy was also started by Metropolitan Filaret of Moscow, who allegedly was Fyodor Nikitich Romanov, the father of the alleged first tsar from the Romanov dynasty, Mikhail. Having seen enough of how these guys work, I no longer believe in the coincidence of such coincidences.
And in general, if we talk about the Romanovs, then this is not a dynasty, but in general it is not clear what. Genetic link between the first generation and the last Romanov is absent in principle, while it was interrupted and changed to another at least three times. Everything is fine there only on paper, but in fact there are continuous murders and coups d'état.
This is truly a miracle. I also have some thoughts on this topic, but this is already in another article.
Many people ask the following question. So you painted everything so well, and even seemed to convince that the invaders are so cool and powerful really exist. So what to do? Where to run, how to escape and is it possible to somehow cope with them at all?
This will be the last question, the answer to which I want to put an end to in this series of articles about the death of the Great Russian State in Siberia, which will be reborn anyway.
I also noticed a few strange things in the behavior of the invaders. Firstly, the fact that they are hiding does not only mean that they are trying to mislead the people of Earth. Judging by the old myths of different peoples, they did not do this before. Based on this, I came to the conclusion that they are afraid of someone besides us, it is for this reason that they are trying to arrange everything on Earth as if it were we ourselves who were making this whole mess.
Secondly, the last two hundred years have seen an explosive growth in technogenic science and the development of technologies based on it. Moreover, they are beginning to open up and allow us to use and develop quite serious things, such as nuclear weapons, electronics or modern weapons.
As a result, I got the strong impression that these "gentlemen" are building here, on Earth, the production base they need. And they can only do this for two reasons. Either their original world was destroyed, so it is necessary to settle more thoroughly in the new one, or their squad that controlled solar system, was blocked here by the approaching rescue forces from the other fraternal worlds, and they are forced to accumulate forces in order to break through the blockade.
The latter option is also indicated by the fact that the individuals themselves alien race, as far as I could find out, is quite small. In addition, it is quite obvious to me that humanity invented most of the open technologies on its own, albeit with suggestive tips. On this occasion, I and several other readers who sent their comments and letters independently came to the conclusion that the original language of the alien race is Latin.
Some researchers consider it a dead or artificially created language, since there are many oddities in its origin and distribution. But the fact that in the so-called "black magic" all spells are read in Latin, in the Catholic Church the service is conducted in Latin, and almost all the first scientific books on mathematics, physics, chemistry and medicine were written exclusively in Latin, and Latin itself was mandatory for study at all old universities, point to the fact that this is the language of the technogenic civilization that captured us, in which they transmitted their knowledge (although not all), and that is why it is used to communicate with them during church ceremonies (public mode) or during magical rituals (closed, secret mode).
The fact that the third force is already here, and that it is playing on our side, I personally had no doubts after February 15, 2013, when in the sky over Chelyabinsk alien ship knocked down a stone block that the invaders launched to demonstrate their capabilities. If that meteorite had not been shot down and flew to the point where it was sent, this entire series of articles simply would not have happened.
The fact that he was shot down was reported even through the central channels. Those who wish to verify this can watch the video at the links below.
A. DYKHOVICHNY - Good afternoon! You are listening to the radio station "Echo of Moscow". Aleksey Dykhovichny is at the microphone, Gleb Nosovsky, Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Differential Geometry and Applications of the Faculty of Mechanics and Mathematics of Moscow State University, one of the authors of Fomenko-Nosovsky's "New Chronology" is our guest. Zv, Gleb Vladimirovich.
G. NOSOVSKY - Hello!
A. DYKHOVICHNY - Great Tartaria - we are talking about it today. In principle, the term has been known for a long time, but, as far as I understand, you and official history interpret and explain it in completely different ways, right?
G. NOSOVSKY - Well, one can say so, although the official history, in fact, does not explain it. He says that this is simply a delusion of cartographers who did not know well what they depicted.
A. DYKHOVICHNY - Europeans ... first of all, the Middle Ages - as I understand it.
G. NOSOVSKY - Yes, although this reveals that there are Russian maps of the 18th century, on which this Great Tartary is depicted in the same way. There are fewer of these cards, but they also exist, so to say that these are the mistakes of the Europeans is not entirely correct. If there are mistakes, then the mistakes of everyone, including Russians. Although, as it is believed, Siberia belonged to Roman Russia and even letters exist, for example, Alexei Mikhailovich sent to Siberia in the 17th century. I will talk about this charter even later - this is an obvious fake, which arose after Pugachev, but it is dated to the 17th century. It was pretended that after the defeat of Pugachev - about which our book “Pugachev and Suvorov. Mystery of the Siberian and American history”, well, and in other books, too, quite a lot is said. But, this book is dedicated specifically to this topic.
According to our research, based on a huge amount of factual material that has come down to us from the 18th century and books and maps, and the most diverse geographical border lines that have remained on the ground: cannons - of course, there are no cannons themselves - there are places for cannons, ramparts and so on. According to this huge amount of material from the time of Pugachev, most of Siberia was a separate state. It was not entirely, of course, strictly connected, but, nevertheless, it was a state consisting of parts more or less independent of each other. It was called the Great Tartary. It was called so by the Europeans. How the Siberians called themselves is a very interesting question, and we are currently investigating it. The Europeans called Great Tartaria, and, by the way, not only foreigners, but also in Romanov Russia called it that, which contradicts the fact that Siberia belonged to Russia, because otherwise they should have called it not Siberia and Tartaria, but a province. And all these Siberian provinces also arose after Pugachev. And we are told a fairy tale that after Pugachev, Catherine suddenly thought that NERAZB. very few and all of Siberia belongs to the Kazan province. And it turns out that there are provinces, and one of them - Kazan - every time surpasses all put together.
And so, allegedly at the court of Catherine in the 1780s, they thought about it, suddenly they discovered and began to create Siberian provinces. Therefore, the coin business speaks about this: there was a separate Siberian coin, which they are also trying to somehow explain. A separate issue with gold and silver is just a song. Perhaps I will touch on this in more detail later, but in a nutshell I will say that throughout the 18th century the St. Petersburg treasury experienced a terrible, absolutely, lack of precious metals. There was no gold and silver, there were no diamonds. An incidental case with Lomonosov, who was given 2 thousand rubles in copper coins, because there was no silver and gold in the treasury. He was given a prize of two and a half tons in coins. Everyone knows that there was no silver and gold. However, how it was not - we ask - if Siberia belonged to Roman Russia, and this is a pantry of gold and silver, especially gold. Moreover, Siberian developments had already begun, that is, there was no need to look for anything there. In addition, another letter was from Alexei Mikhailovich of the 17th century, where he ordered to search for and develop these gold deposits. There is loose gold. Therefore, sitting on a huge stock, especially surface gold - to have an empty treasury?
Yes, there are very vague explanations: “Yes, they were developed by Romanov Russia even in the 18th century thanks to that charter. Do you know what kind of booty there was in the 18th century? From one mine 400 grams per year - that's it. One of the largest Siberian gold mines, which after Pugachev began to produce tons, and so on. If you look, then the picture bears obvious traces of falsification ...
A. DYKHOVICHNY - As I am constantly forced to somehow combine your "New Chronology" with the chronology familiar to me, I want everything by years .... If Catherine II, I understand that this is 250 years ago, even less - 230 years ago. 230 years ago - as I understand it, you say - Siberia did not belong to Russia?
G. NOSOVSKY - Romanov Russia - did not belong.
A. DYKHOVICHNY - And who then? When did this Great Tartary originate, to whom did it belong, who was it? Explain.
G. NOSOVSKY - That's amazing. More recently, you can feel it with your hands - a huge number of documents. Why are there so many left? Because very recently. These are not some manuscripts that need to be studied, extracted from them ...
A. DYKHOVICHNY - Tell us what? What is something?
G. NOSOVSKY - I talk a lot about what is left, and I don’t want to repeat myself: these are maps, these are books, testimonies, boundary lines on the ground along those lines that are drawn ...
A. DYKHOVICHNY - What kind of state was it?
G. NOSOVSKY - This is a coin business, this is gold and silver - all this speaks of the same thing. So what kind of state was it? Yes, indeed, in the version of history we are accustomed to, this state cannot exist. There is no place for him, because we all know that Siberia was conquered by Yermak, was at the hand of the Moscow tsars, and we do not argue with this. If we look at the maps of the 16th century, then this Great Tartary - it covers not only Siberia, it also covers the entire European part of Russia. it single state. That's what Western Europeans called us. We must understand this. The word "Tatars" is used today not in the sense in which it was used before. Today we call Tatars, to put it simply, the Muslim part of the Russian population.
A. DYKHOVICHNY - Well, this is very simplified.
G. NOSOVSKY - Well, a strong correlation. If we take the Muslim part of the Russian Empire, take the Tatars, then there will be a very strong overlap between them…. I don't want…
A. DYKHOVICHNY - I have to say that I don’t agree at all ...
G. NOSOVSKY - Well, give an example, which Russian population of the Russian Empire is Muslim, but is not called Tatars? Well, there are Bashkirs .... But, understand - there are fewer of them. Here is the majority...
A. DYKHOVICHNY - And, the Caucasus?
G. NOSOVSKY - If we add up all the Bashkirs and the entire Caucasus and compare it with the Tatar population of Russia, then after all, the majority ...
A. DYKHOVICHNY - Well, I will not argue - on your conscience.
G. NOSOVSKY - Good. I'm talking about the origin of the term, you know? The Tatars themselves did not call themselves that before the revolution. Most of them didn't call themselves that. I'm talking about the origin of the term. This term was introduced from above, and, in fact, it was intended, first of all, it was pasted from above to the Muslim population of the Russian Empire. Now in this Muslim population already in Soviet times, there we would say: here, these are Tatars, these are Bashkirs, these are Ossetians - I beg your pardon, Ossetians, of course, are not Muslims .... Understand, all these peoples called themselves in their own way. The combined name of the Tatars stuck to someone, it didn’t stick to someone, but it stuck to the majority of the Muslim population. This name is external. So in fact, the Europeans called all of us, including Russians. It must be understood that not only in the time of the Romanovs the European name of the Tatars was taken, it was taken away from the Russians, but it never belonged not only to the Russians, but also to all other peoples. This is an external name that was taken from the west and assigned Muslim people. Someone has been assigned, someone, as you rightly say, not assigned - but this is a very late thing.
If we look at old sources, for example, let's take sources from the beginning of the 17th century. It talks about the Tobolsk Tatars. And let's take a statistical description of, say, the Tobolsk province. The earliest is the middle of the 19th century. You know, it's good to see. They remained, for example, in the dictionary of Brockhaus and Efron - you can look. 98% of Russians - Tobolsk province. Siberian provinces, by the way, if we take a statistical description of Siberia in the 19th century and compare the population with, say, a statistical description Central Russia 19th century. In our view, Central Russia is, as it were, more Russian than Siberia. We think so that all sorts of other nations are more present there. The statistics of the 19th century say just the opposite. If we take Brockhaus and Efron, I simply remind you that the word “Russians” in the sense of Brockhaus and Efron, in the sense of the 19th century, means Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians. Separation is the discovery of Soviet scientists. Then they called the word “Russians” Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians. I will speak in this sense, because I will refer to the sources of the 19th century, so that each time I do not tie Soviet terminology.
If we look at a statistical description - well available to everyone - then Siberia was 85% Russian in the 19th century. And in Central Russia - by 70%, even there the difference is greater. Therefore, it was Siberia, with the exception of individual centers, it was practically Russian. But, if we look at all sorts of maps, we will see: Tobolsk Tatars - there could not be more than 2% of them there, but the entire population is called “Tobolsk Tatars”. And, if we take the description of the Great Tartaria of the 18th century by Baidu Khan of Khivey - from him, if we look - all of Siberia is inhabited by Kalmyks. All Siberia is Kalmyks.
A. DYKHOVICHNY - To be honest, I'm confused. I understand that the national question - it is worth ...
G. NOSOVSKY - I do not touch national question here. I want to explain that, looking at a source not even of the 17th century, and seeing the name in it: Kalmyks, Tatars, and so on, we must understand that all this must be checked. That these are mostly names… the same work by Baidu Khan that I was talking about – it was not Baidu Khan himself who wrote: “Kalmyks”. He was transferred. The original exists. Translated to French. It all went through the Western European edition. And, in fact, in these sources we see the Western European terminology of that time. How they described our country. And, in these sources of naming peoples - they, in fact, very often, from the point of view of their content - are incorrect. Therefore, when we say Great Tartaria, we must understand that all of Russia and all its peoples were called Tatars and Tartars. Western Europeans called so, and Russians, including.
A. DYKHOVICHNY - And, where was the western border?
G. NOSOVSKY - The western border of what?
A. DYKHOVICHNY - What you describe ...
G. NOSOVSKY - Tartaria? The western border of the Great Tartaria - we talked about this, by the way, at our second, in my opinion, meeting - it moved a little during the 18th century.
A. DYKHOVICHNY - Sorry, I did not take notes ...
G. NOSOVSKY - But, it did not pass approximately, but exactly along the so-called Siberian lines, along fortified, with ditches, with places for cannons - defensive lines, which are marked on the map, and many of which remain on the ground. Speaking very roughly, it passed west of the Urals and crossed the Volga.
A. DYKHOVICHNY - Oh, Russia - it was before ...
G. NOSOVSKY - A, Russia - Romanovskaya .... When we say the word "Romanov Russia"…. Here, again, you are in captivity of terminology .... Petersburg Romanov Russia, which was ruled, in fact, by the Germans after Peter the Great. We said in detail that Peter the Great was a false tsar, and that a certain group of Germans came. These are ethnic Germans, they took over this country, they, in general, ruled it, and they were completely Western European people. Therefore, it is Romanov's Russia, in ideology, an absolutely Western European state, at least during the 18th and the first half of the 19th, after which it began to be reborn. Yes, the end of the 19th century is another matter - the beginning of the 20th - Russia began to become Russian, in terms of its rule. At least until the age of 17. There, it practically became Russian, but in the 18th century... I will once again give an example that I have already given: during the dispute between Lomonosov and German academicians - this is the beginning of the 18th century. After this dispute, Lomonosov himself was put under house arrest, and many of his associates were exiled or even executed. The wording was: "For disrespect for the German soil." At the beginning of the 18th century, Russian academicians were executed for disrespect for the German land” - this must be perfectly understood. With this wording.
A. DYKHOVICHNY - I want to understand. Farther. When Romanov Russia, from your point of view, conquered - anyway, there was some kind of conquest - is it a beggar, it should be noted (they didn’t have money) Romanov Russia conquered this Great Tartary?
G. NOSOVSKY - It was a war with Pugachev. This war, which was presented as a war with some rebellious peasants. It was a big war.
A. DYKHOVICHNY - But how did a poor state conquer a great one?
G. NOSOVSKY - Well, you know, it happens. But it was advanced, and that was backward. There were factories, there were advanced technologies. And, Great Tartaria was quite loose. Yes, they had enough gold...
A. DYKHOVICHNY - How great is she, then?
G. NOSOVSKY - Great Tartaria is Great Tartaria. The word "Great" means "big". The word Great Russia Big Russia, Little Russia - Little Russia.
Its greatness was the legacy of that great empire, but the name remained, but in fact, since it lost, it means that it was a weak state. Despite such a huge territory, despite the gold and so on. The military was backward. There were few firearms, there were no factories. And this happens in history. Do not think that great states cannot perish. They can and how. And, very often - because of self-confidence, by the way. They think that they are great, and their greatness is already in the past, so this happens in history. One must constantly prove one's greatness and is at the front, as it were, level, including knowledge. This state was historically great, great in size. He covered, by the way. Not only Siberia. It also covered North America. And, when they defeated Pugachev, the seizure of this state came from the spirit of the parties - this must also be understood. Romanov Russia captured the Siberian lands, and the North American States, which were in front of Pugachev, was a narrow strip along the western coast. Narrow strip of states. If you look at the map of the United States of the pre-Pugachev time, this is a dwarf state on the east coast North America. And, its advancement to the Wild West - as we know all these westerns, they went to the west - it began after Pugachev. Here, in any textbook open - read.
And, they collided, by the way ..., interests collided: at first the Romanovs ceded Oregon, then they conceded Alaska. These are also deals of the 19th century on disputed territories, because they agreed on both sides. Therefore, once again, summing up: what is Great Tartaria? Great Tartaria is the largest fragment of the great empire. great empire, according to our reconstruction, it was, in general, the whole world. That is, according to our reconstruction in the 16th century, the world was politically one. He had two centers: Moscow and Istanbul. Two capitals - hence the double-headed eagle. But, these were friendly capitals, and politically it was united. And, in both capitals, the administration was Slavic. We also imagine the history of Turkey completely wrong. Turkey 15-16, yes, and earlier - well, it doesn’t matter now, let’s talk about it - about Ottoman Turkey in the second half of the 15th, 16th and early 17th centuries - it was a state under Slavic rule. There is a huge amount of information about this. Just like the Great Tartary.
But, you need to understand another important thing, that Tatar is also Turkish language, which we today perceive as some kind of alien to us - this vernacular Russia. Our Russian ancestors also once spoke this Tatar, but perhaps a more archaic language. And, this division by language - what we speak today in Russian, and the Muslim part continues to speak - although there is an exception - in Tatar - this is a consequence, namely, of religious division. Church Slavonic - our ancestors learned in the church. This is the church language, the sacred language that they have learned and it has supplanted the national Tatar language from them. Those who continue to speak Tatar - their ancestors did not switch to the sacred Arabic language- it is too complicated for our pronunciation. They still do not understand it, although they are in the majority ... You know that Muslims conduct services in Arabic, right? Here, go to our Tatars - they basically do not understand.
Thus, this is a state in which the administration was Slavic, the diplomatic language in which was Slavic - this state collapsed in the 17th century, and the largest flap lasted for about 200 years - a little less.
A. DYKHOVICHNY - I'm trying to remember now - I knew this word - like thank you in Turkish. I forgot, I can't. Gleb Nosovsky, Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Differential Geometry and Applications of the Faculty of Mechanics and Mathematics of Moscow State University, one of the authors of the New Chronology by Fomenko-Nosovsky, was our guest. Gleb Vladimirovich, thank you!
- The displacement is called the vector connecting the start and end points of the trajectory The vector connecting the beginning and end of the path is called
- Trajectory, path length, displacement vector Vector connecting the initial position
- Calculating the area of a polygon from the coordinates of its vertices The area of a triangle from the coordinates of the vertices formula
- Permissible Value Area (ODZ), Theory, Examples, Solutions